W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2016

RE: Technical baseline clause revisited?

From: Karen Lewellen <klewellen@shellworld.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 16:43:44 -0400 (EDT)
To: Howard Leicester <howard_leicester@btconnect.com>
cc: 'ALAN SMITH' <alands289@gmail.com>, 'David Best' <davebest@cogeco.ca>, 'Phill Jenkins' <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>, 'Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL' <ryladog@gmail.com>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1608311643270.5869@server2.shellworld.net>
Oh thanks Howard!
Kare


On Wed, 31 Aug 2016, Howard Leicester wrote:

> Peace And Love!
> Howard L XXX
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Karen Lewellen [mailto:klewellen@shellworld.net]
> Sent: 31 August 2016 20:18
> To: ALAN SMITH <alands289@gmail.com>
> Cc: David Best <davebest@cogeco.ca>; 'Phill Jenkins' <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>; 'Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL' <ryladog@gmail.com>; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Technical baseline clause revisited?
>
> So Sorry Alan,
> The private,  referred to David, which is why I shared that under his reply.  I still need to read posts from the 25th, that was the day of my mediation, and I am still digging out.
> Karen
>
>
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2016, ALAN SMITH wrote:
>
>> Karen,
>>
>> If by private, were you are referring to my reply to Phil?
>> It was to the entire chain and you were included in the cc line back on 8-25-16.
>>
>> And yes, I wish complaining paid better as well. 😊
>>
>> Best.
>>
>> Alan
>>
>> Sent from Mail for Windows 10
>>
>> From: Karen Lewellen
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 31 August 2016 20:44:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 31 August 2016 20:44:13 UTC