W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2016

RE: Technical baseline clause revisited?

From: Howard Leicester <howard_leicester@btconnect.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 21:06:07 +0100
To: 'Karen Lewellen' <klewellen@shellworld.net>, 'ALAN SMITH' <alands289@gmail.com>
CC: 'David Best' <davebest@cogeco.ca>, 'Phill Jenkins' <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>, 'Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL' <ryladog@gmail.com>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000001d203c3$1d7be2d0$5873a870$@btconnect.com>
Peace And Love!
Howard L XXX

-----Original Message-----
From: Karen Lewellen [mailto:klewellen@shellworld.net] 
Sent: 31 August 2016 20:18
To: ALAN SMITH <alands289@gmail.com>
Cc: David Best <davebest@cogeco.ca>; 'Phill Jenkins' <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>; 'Katie Haritos-Shea GMAIL' <ryladog@gmail.com>; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Subject: RE: Technical baseline clause revisited?

So Sorry Alan,
The private,  referred to David, which is why I shared that under his reply.  I still need to read posts from the 25th, that was the day of my mediation, and I am still digging out.

On Wed, 31 Aug 2016, ALAN SMITH wrote:

> Karen,
> If by private, were you are referring to my reply to Phil?
> It was to the entire chain and you were included in the cc line back on 8-25-16.
> And yes, I wish complaining paid better as well. 😊
> Best.
> Alan
> Sent from Mail for Windows 10
> From: Karen Lewellen
Received on Wednesday, 31 August 2016 20:06:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 31 August 2016 20:06:49 UTC