W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: Htacces and WCAG 2

From: W Reagan <wreagan1@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:16:52 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <750398.74249.qm@web111601.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Ben, if we denied /googlemail.com you could not see our site. This is the type of information our security team has set up. Does it conflict with any accessibility standards?
 
As I mentioned earlier, our security team keeps track of users by IP address and also check out other sites where our domain is posted, but should not be.
 
What can we do to maintain security while maintaing accessibility
 
What criteria(s) are in conflict, if any?

--- On Wed, 8/12/09, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com> wrote:


From: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: Htacces and WCAG 2
To: "W Reagan" <wreagan1@yahoo.com>
Cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Date: Wednesday, August 12, 2009, 4:32 PM


On 12/08/2009 15:39, W Reagan wrote:
[snip irrelevant detail]
> We need to protect our security and maintain accessibility.

You're asking us for help. But you need to help us help you.

Please answer my simple questions:

1. "[Do you] have special reason to think that blocking by IP or referrer would reduce the accessibility of your website to people with disabilities?"

2. "Which of the success criteria listed at http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/ do you think might conflict with blocking HTTP requests by IP or referrer?"

It's not obvious why you would think this, so please explain your thought process.

--
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Received on Wednesday, 12 August 2009 17:17:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:32 GMT