- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2007 23:29:47 +0200
- To: "Simon Evans" <simon.evans@rixcentre.org>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 11:53:16 +0200, Simon Evans <simon.evans@rixcentre.org> wrote: > I'm scrabbling round looking for (UK) examples at the minute and would be > grateful if anyone has precedents (or cases that were settled pre-court > for > plaintiff) which contradict the above - the only solid case I have the > details of is more clear cut and relates to an examinee who couldn't > effectively access an online test via screen reader. Contacting either RNIB or the W3C Office in the UK might be a good way to find out more. (Or not - confidentiality is something that a lot of places like). There were certainly results where the response was to actually improve the accessibility of the website. And others, such as the current case, where someone said they would do something but the implementation was really ust a sorry joke. cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk chaals@opera.com Catch up: Speed Dial http://opera.com
Received on Saturday, 9 June 2007 21:30:09 UTC