- From: Cheryl D Wise <cdwise@wiserways.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 22:57:02 -0400
- To: "'Andy Laws'" <adlaws@gmail.com>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
My position is different. I would (and have) documented what the contract (including published policies such as accessibility and privacy state) and legal requirements were, followed up with how what the client wants fails to those requirements. Then if the client is not willing to implement those requirements we terminate the contract. In the most recent case it was not complying with HIPPA (healthcare privacy). Cheryl D Wise MS MVP FrontPage http://by-expression.com http://starttoweb.com Foundations of Microsoft Expression Web: The Basics and Beyond -----Original Message----- From: Andy Laws I would like to say a big thank you to every body that has contributed to this post, it has certainly improved my own knowledge, we have decided on the following course of action 1) Document our own recommendations and forward to the client (This covers us legally) 2) Implement there site as they want it 3) Inform the DDA after the work has been completed personally i would like to set up a site that Names and Shames offending web sites, as this seems to be a standard within the industry that people are claiming that there site are access able when clearly they are not Many Many thanks again Andy Laws www.think.eu
Received on Saturday, 9 June 2007 02:57:45 UTC