> It's not valid, because it violates the requirement that the > document be valid both before and after being manipulated by > the scripting. David, can you clarify where this requirement is spelled out? In many cases it doesn't make sense - if I use javascript to modify the DOM, I'm not modifying the HTML that has the validation linkage, I'm modifying the browsers interpretation initial interpretation of that HTML. I understand that you are objecting to the embed element in the document.write statement, and that's fine. There are ways to avoid using the embed element, but it does require some means of differentiating between browsers. I wrote up some test results on this topic at: http://weblogs.macromedia.com/accessibility/archives/2005/08/in_search_o f_a.cfm This needs to be updated - JAWS 7.0/7.1 have made some changes for the better in this regard. AWKReceived on Friday, 6 October 2006 15:35:52 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 18:14:41 GMT