W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2005

Re: Copywriting for Screenreaders (was Alt text for URL's)

From: david poehlman <david.poehlman@handsontechnologeyes.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 08:50:48 -0500
Message-ID: <003a01c51365$5bd50940$6401a8c0@DAVIDPC>
To: "Alastair Campbell" <ac@nomensa.com>
Cc: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>

This is part of my point though, part of the power lies in the user agent 
camp.  There is nothing rong with a navigation bar.  There is a lot rong 
with they way they are implemented whether it is an authoring decision or a 
user agent/assistive technology decision.

Johnnie Apple Seed
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alastair Campbell" <ac@nomensa.com>
To: "david poehlman" <david.poehlman@handsontechnologeyes.com>
Cc: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 8:38 AM
Subject: Re: Copywriting for Screenreaders (was Alt text for URL's)

david poehlman wrote:
> If we need to skip it, te question becomes, what is rong with it that it
> needs to be skipped?  The answer lies somewhere in te reasoning beind its
> invention in the first place and that is to allow for the skipping of
> "repetative" links.

I think an example of a good site without a consistent navigation bar
would help me to understand your point here?

Kind regards,



Alastair Campbell   |   Director of Research & Development

Please refer to the following disclaimer for this message:
Received on Tuesday, 15 February 2005 14:14:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:31 UTC