W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2005

Re: img::longdesc: must it be a separate page?

From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 00:34:10 +0100
Message-ID: <42A38BF2.90009@splintered.co.uk>
To: WAI Interest Group <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>

Matthew Smith wrote:

> Is there any reason why longdesc (img) cannot point to an anchor within
> a page?

No, there isn't. Who said otherwise?

Per HTML 4.01 spec, the only requirement is that longdesc needs to be a 
URI (see http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/objects.html#h-13.2 )

> My thought was to have the long description at the very end of
> the page, with a link back to an anchor where the image is.

A valid approach, in my opinion.

-- 
Patrick H. Lauke
_____________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
Received on Sunday, 5 June 2005 23:34:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:21 GMT