- From: James Craig <wai-ig@cookiecrook.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 12:57:14 -0600
- To: Gabriel Bulfon <gbulfon@cgp.gba.gov.ar>, "WAI Mailing list (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Gabriel Bulfon wrote: > thank for your help James, but why map shouldn't be there? I guess I should rephrase that. I said "shouldn't" because my reference says "Conventional content within the <map> tag /may/ be displayed by the browser, <area> tags will not." To me that means conventional content may not be displayed. But if you have a good reason for using them, my choice of the word "shouldn't" was probably too strong. Sorry. On closer inspection of the HTML spec, <map> elements can ONLY contain <area> tags or block-level content. So it looks like you may want to use a <ul> inside your <map> anyway. Have you tried validating your source? <http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/struct/objects.html#h-13.6.1> > why this is not a question for accessibility guys? Because this is an technical HTML problem. Although many of the technologies overlap, I think this particular question would be better suited for an HTML list. Cheers, James Craig -- http://cookiecrook.com/
Received on Thursday, 5 February 2004 13:57:30 UTC