W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2004

RE: Accessibility definition, was focus

From: <David.Pawson@rnib.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 15:41:37 +0100
Message-ID: <9B66BBD37D5DD411B8CE00508B69700F06FFDEDC@pborolocal.rnib.org.uk>
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org

    > Which *code* are you referring to btw?
    
    section 508 of the Rehab Act (USA law)
OK, I'm  not affected by that one. 
    

    > At least it might be a positive decision? My guess is 
    that today thats 
    > a position taken due in large part through lack of understanding?
    
    not sure if I understand what your getting at here??


I guess I'd rather deal with an author who knew that they were not
reaching a part of an audience and knew it, than an author who
was totally unaware that there were segments of her readers not being
reached?
  A minor step along the way?

regards DaveP.

-- 
DISCLAIMER: 

NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended 
recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the 
content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the 
sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it 
and any attachments from your system. 

RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by 
its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any  such which are transmitted.
We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. 

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and 
any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent 
those of RNIB. 

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk 
Received on Thursday, 10 June 2004 10:44:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:13:33 UTC