W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2004

RE: More scripting thoughts Pt. 2 (was RE: Accessible road maps)

From: Mike Barta <mikba@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 14:26:31 -0700
Message-ID: <7DF35A0B5F67E84B9095C21C8A97641802493382@RED-MSG-33.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <sdale@stevendale.com>, <foliot@wats.ca>
Cc: <accessys@smart.net>, <Kurt_Mattes@bankone.com>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>

 I would disagree here.  A web page can be a document, it can just as
easily be an application.  If we consider that page == file then the
point is well made, but if page == URI then the browser, while being
capable of displaying simple files, can be seen as an output device for
whatever lives at that URI.

As a guideline we need to recommend practices for making accessible
experiences for both of these cases by not limiting our focus to a
single technology, e.g. html, but to any technology used for URI
addressable 'content'.


-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Steven Dale

We are not talking about programs here, we are talking documents.  I
think this is the crux of the scripting problem.  A WEBPAGE IS A
DOCUMENT NOT A PROGRAM.  If you want networking applications, write a
program.  If you want to convey information, use the web.

Received on Wednesday, 2 June 2004 17:26:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:28 UTC