W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2004

RE: Accessible road maps

From: <Kurt_Mattes@bankone.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 12:31:56 -0400
Message-ID: <B239BEDED044074C8E2CCC3A9162F2A90A26D856@swilnts804.wil.fusa.com>
To: <accessys@smart.net>, <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>
Cc: <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>

Where is the guideline that requires supporting ALL possible configurations.  Do you also make the argument that all new MAC software must work on an Apple II?  And let's not limit this to the MAC platform.  Perhaps all new PC software should be required to work on a Commadore 64 or PC running an 8086 chip as well as it does on a PC using a P4 chip or the manufacturer should be hauled into court.  Wonder if this would have any impact on software development.  

Kurt Mattes
Application Development Analyst - Lead Developer

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of Access Systems
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 11:43 AM
To: Phill Jenkins
Cc: David Woolley; w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Subject: Re: Accessible road maps

On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Phill Jenkins wrote:

I feel like I have repeated this at least a gazillion times but

> - or -  fix the one or two browsers that don't fully support the HTML 4.01
> spec? For example, would it be more cost efficient for government to fund
> the improvement of Lynx than to mandate all the web applications to revert
> to HTML 2 days?
> I am also surprised at some of the "right's" arguments.  Individuals I
> talk to who have disabilities prefer to have access to what everyone else

how many people with disabilities have you talked to in the third world??

> has access to, including web application using scripting.  Most
> individual's who have disabilities do not want to be ghettoized to use
> some other less capable web application.  Individuals who have
> disabilities NEED the faster client side scripting just like everyone
> else.  They want to come in the front door just like everyone else.

We are dealing with a WORLD WIDE WEB. and I emphisize the WORLD WIDE part.
in many parts of the world people especially people with disabilities have
very limited bandwidth and service and cannot afford to deal with the HUGE
resources required to use the more "modern" browsers.  in at least one
contact (an independent living center) I have in Nicaragua they are still
linked to the web with a Apple II, and an acoustic coupler.  can you even
support scripting at 1200 baud???  (offered em a newer modem but the
telephone lines wouldn't handle it)

THESE people need access to the web maybe even more than we do.

and we must continue to support thier access.


CONFIGURE YOUR E-MAIL TO SEND TEXT ONLY, see http://expita.com/nomime.html

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve Neither liberty nor safety",    Benjamin Franklin
-   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -
   ASCII Ribbon Campaign                        accessBob
    NO HTML/PDF/RTF in e-mail                   accessys@smartnospam.net
    NO MSWord docs in e-mail                    Access Systems, engineers
    NO attachments in e-mail,  *LINUX powered*   access is a civil right
THIS message and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be
privileged.  They are intended ONLY for the individual or entity named

This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you
Received on Wednesday, 2 June 2004 12:33:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:28 UTC