> AMEN! ...sister! > And isnt that what we are after here? Accessibility? If you have a choice between a dog of a browser that doesn't work with pixel-sized fonts, found in real-world sites, and a newer browser that does (*and* has tabbed browsing, popup blocking, better standards compliance, and the like), why would you go with the dog? Now, if you *don't* have a choice, that's *different*. Let's just stop pretending that the Web equals IE for Windows. > Sounds to me like many so called experts on here want the prestige > without doing the work. I do quite a lot of work, thank you very much. > Joe Clark, for example, showed a very arrogant and unrealistic > demand for everyone to make people upgrade. I demanded nothing. I could start, though. > Julian Scarlett said: > > James Craig wrote: Wow. A double top-post. -- Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org Accessibility <http://joeclark.org/access/> Expect criticism if you top-postReceived on Tuesday, 6 April 2004 16:18:40 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:28 UTC