Re: Guild of Accessible Web Designers starts membership drive

My understanding is that terms like "Universal Design," "Universal 
Access," "Access for All," and "Barrier Free" can all be used 
synonomously with "Accessibility for people's with Disabilities."  
Unfortunately, they can also be used to mean different things.  In Hong 
Kong, for example, "Barrier Free" and "Access for All" refer NOT to 
Accessibility for People with Disabilities - they refer to an effort to 
get all economic classes of people, and differently-educated people into 
the world of Technology - in other words, these phrases are being used 
for "The Technological Divide."  "Universal Design," from a Usability 
worldview, is probably more of a superset that includes usability for 
people's with disabilities, but is not restricted to those users. 

George - anything you can add?

-Kerstin

Access Systems wrote:

>On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, John Colby wrote:
>
>interestingly all of my mail concernig the "guild" is being intercepted by
>my firewall,  hopefully I have this corrected
>
>  
>
>>	On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, John Colby wrote:
>>	
>>	the term gaining acceptance in some areas is
>>	"Universal Design"
>>	kind of inclusive without making it appear "handicapped" oriented
>>	Bob
>>	
>>	Which areas, Bob?
>>    
>>
>
>NorthEastern part of USA that I'm aware of, have heard it used elsewhere
>
>Bob 
>
>"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
>safety deserve Neither liberty nor safety",    Benjamin Franklin
>-   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -
>   ASCII Ribbon Campaign                        accessBob                       
>    NO HTML/PDF/RTF in e-mail                   accessys@smartnospam.net       
>    NO MSWord docs in e-mail                    Access Systems, engineers       
>    NO attachments in e-mail,  *LINUX powered*   access is a civil right 
>*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#
>THIS message and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be
>privileged.  They are intended ONLY for the individual or entity named
>
>
>  
>