W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 2002

Re: accessible navigation

From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 10:11:00 -0400
To: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>, W3c-Wai-Ig <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-id: <001c01c229ad$f3a67a50$19e03244@DAVIDPOEHLMAN>

I agree and back to contant or back to navigation should be sufficient.
remember, we are dealing here with a small window where the content
might not be displayed.  It is a tough conundrum.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Ley" <jim@jibbering.com>
To: "W3c-Wai-Ig" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:30 AM
Subject: Re: accessible navigation

"John Foliot - bytown internet" <foliot@bytowninternet.com>
> > Though I understand how the client might not agree...
> >
> How would a client not agree to making their site "better"?  Better
> those with disabilities sure, but also for older users (like their
> perhaps?), inexperienced users, power users, etc.  Having these links
> options to each page and improves navigation

I don't entirely agree, if you have a link at the bottom of the page
saying "to the content" or "to the navigation" I am confused, I've just
read the content and now there's a link to some more content, or is it
the same content or what? similarly with the navigation, new navigation,
different navigation I think the link text here is important to the
issue, and no-one's suggested what that might be.

Received on Friday, 12 July 2002 10:11:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:19 UTC