- From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 14:15:54 -0000
- To: "W3c-Wai-Ig" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
"David Poehlman" <poehlman1@comcast.net> > I agree and back to contant or back to navigation should be sufficient. > remember, we are dealing here with a small window where the content > might not be displayed. It is a tough conundrum. We're not dealing with a small window at all, we're dealing with an HTML document... If it says back to content or back to navigation I would expect it to go to another page with content and/or navigation I wouldn't expect it to be within the same document, I don't see why, Also surely back is a problematical word as it implies you've been there before - which isn't guaranteed at all (even within the same document you could've arrived at the content portion missing the navigation.) I don't have any solutions to this unfortunately. In documents like the W3's recommendations, it's probably okay, you have _contents_ etc. which you can link to as _contents_ but using vague terms like "to navigation" and "to content" I find very confusing about where it's likely to take me. Jim.
Received on Friday, 12 July 2002 10:23:43 UTC