W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > April to June 2002

Re: Frames and accessibility: opinions please

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:33:25 -0400 (EDT)
To: Jim Byrne <j.byrne@gcal.ac.uk>
cc: W3c_Access <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0204241431380.21751-100000@tux.w3.org>
Hi,

I wouldn't use frames because of the problems that they cause for
bookmarking. If I really thought people knew how to make them work I would -
but I would make sure that there was a good noframes section that meant
people could live with or without them. I saw a good example of this when I
was looking for a cheap hotel, but I forget where it was now <sigh/>.

I expect the frames thing to be solved in about 5 years, which would be nice
- the idea is pretty useful.

cheers

Chaals

On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Jim Byrne wrote:

  Hi,

  I am some accessibility advice to an organisation designing a Website aimed
  at people with learning difficulties and those supporting people with
  learning difficulties. The designers want to build the site based on using
  Frames for navigation - quoting the W3c guidelines saying that they can be
  made accessible. For all the reasons I have listed on my site (see
  http://www.mcu.org.uk) I don't think this is a good idea - but I am keen to
  hear what people on this list think of frames and accessibility.

  If your were building a Website from scratch, that had to be accessible -
  would you use frames? If not why not?

  Thanks,
  Jim



-- 
Charles McCathieNevile    http://www.w3.org/People/Charles  phone: +61 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative     http://www.w3.org/WAI  fax: +33 4 92 38 78 22
Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia
(or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Wednesday, 24 April 2002 14:33:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:14:04 GMT