W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired

From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@home.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 11:15:32 -0500
Message-ID: <001001c184ba$8eca7160$c2f20141@mtgmry1.md.home.com>
To: "Scott Luebking" <phoenixl@sonic.net>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
as I understand the excerpt, it is a server/client side choice issue.
this is enterpretted to me as being that content is served from the same
bucket and the user has the choice.  I see no reason why we should lower
the bar.  The guidelines are still in draft so I wouldn't relie on
anything in them to be deffinitive on the final.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott Luebking" <phoenixl@sonic.net>
To: <phoenixl@sonic.net>; <poehlman1@home.com>; <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 11:10 AM
Subject: Re: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired


Hi,

Unless I misunderstood, the context this was provided to me was that
the guidelines had moved to being more supportive of multiple versions
of the same web page.  My impression is that it was no longer an
approach of
last choice.  The text that was sent was in the appendix on consensus
issues.

I think that it would apply here, if the web pages have the same
information.

Scott

> but notice what it is bracketted in.  this has been described here and
> elsewhere in the archives of this list as an acceptable solution but
> with many provisos.  your exerpt does not fit the current senario.
Received on Friday, 14 December 2001 11:15:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:13:58 GMT