W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: FWD: CHI-WEB: Amazon's version for the Visually Impaired

From: Carol Foster <c.foster@umassp.edu>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2001 11:31:43 -0500
Message-ID: <3C1A296F.76705F32@umassp.edu>
To: David Poehlman <poehlman1@home.com>
CC: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
My interpretation is also that it is OK to have alternative presentations
when they are all "served from the same bucket" as mentioned, and that this
is even a recommended thing.  There is a relevant current (WCAG 1.0)
Priority 3 checkpoint: 11.3 Provide information so that users may receive
documents according to their  preferences (e.g., language, content type,
etc.).  The techniques for this point mention CSS2 techniques and something
called "content negotiation" which is not entirely clear to me.


David Poehlman wrote:

> as I understand the excerpt, it is a server/client side choice issue.
> this is enterpretted to me as being that content is served from the same
> bucket and the user has the choice.  I see no reason why we should lower
> the bar.  The guidelines are still in draft so I wouldn't relie on
> anything in them to be deffinitive on the final.
Received on Friday, 14 December 2001 11:29:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:15 UTC