W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > January to March 2001

Re: Acronyms... With Indistinct Spellings

From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@home.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 13:14:22 -0500
Message-ID: <001801c08bb1$a30ec3e0$2cf60141@mtgmry1.md.home.com>
To: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
it pronounces anything pronounceable.  it can get it rong though.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Sent: January 31, 2001 11:16 AM
Subject: Acronyms... With Indistinct Spellings


Regarding acronyms in XHTML...

Acronyms are meant to be pronounced, yes? I was just wondering what
the
default behaviour was for them in screen readers, e.g. faced with:-

     <acronym>EARL</acronym>

Would it attempt to say "earl" or "eee ay ar ell"? If it tries to
pronounce
it (which I believe is correct), then what happens if the acronym
could
have an ambiguous spelling? For example,

     <acronym>EARL</acronym> uses <acronym>URL</acronym>s.

[Obviously all of these examples should have titles as well.] Maybe
the
screen reader should spell it out on request, but otherwise pronounce
it...

This has probably been discussed a thousand times before...

--
Kindest Regards,
Sean B. Palmer
@prefix : <http://webns.net/roughterms/> .
[ :name "Sean B. Palmer" ] :hasHomepage <http://infomesh.net/sbp/> .
Received on Wednesday, 31 January 2001 13:14:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 July 2011 18:13:53 GMT