W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > July to September 1999

RE: General Comment re Guidelines/Discussion

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 13:59:27 -0400 (EDT)
To: "webmaster@dors.sailorsite.net" <webmaster@dors.sailorsite.net>
cc: "'Charles F. Munat'" <charles@munat.com>, WAI Interest Group <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9907231357570.7732-100000@tux.w3.org>
This thread is moved to the guidelines list, where itis under discussion.

owever I don't think you have to give up those attributes, you just have to
use a style sheet as well.

Charles McCN

On Fri, 23 Jul 1999, Bruce Bailey wrote:

  I don't have a problem with avoiding wholly deprecated elements. 
   Unfortunately, by my reading, 3.3 is stricter than this.  To follow this 
  checkpoint I would also have to give up all occurrences of 
  ALIGN=CENTER/RIGHT attributes.  That is too much of a sacrifice for me!
  On Wednesday, July 21, 1999 10:39 PM, Charles F. Munat 
  [SMTP:charles@munat.com] wrote:
  > As for Priority 3.3, I read it to say that you should use a stylesheet 
  > layout vs. elements such as B, I, FONT, etc. As far as I'm concerned, as
  > long as you avoid those elements, you've met this priority. If you want 
  > make text red, use a stylesheet or the style attribute rather than the 
  > tag. If you can live without the B, I, etc. tags, and you don't feel that
  > you need a stylesheet, I don't see that Priority 3.3 requires one. What, 
  > blank one, just for looks?

--Charles McCathieNevile            mailto:charles@w3.org
phone: +1 617 258 0992   http://www.w3.org/People/Charles
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative    http://www.w3.org/WAI
MIT/LCS  -  545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139,  USA
Received on Friday, 23 July 1999 13:59:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 13 October 2015 16:21:05 UTC