Re: CFC - ACT Rules format 1.0

+1

Here are a few editorial suggestions, I think in general it needs a full
read for grammar. Here's a couple I noticed in a quick read.

Note a typo in section 3.1 example 3

MUST NOST
should be "MUST NOT"

4.8
Example of a  rule that checks if aria-errormessage is used <add>to</add>
satisfy WCAG 2.1 success criterion 4.1.3 Status messages :

*Recommendation*
4.7
"...If there are no test targets, the outcome for the rule is inapplicable .
..."

I suggest the term "not applicable" (or "nonapplicable" rather than
"inapplicable" so the common short form "N/A" can be used.
https://textranch.com/145717/is-not-applicable/or/is-inapplicable/
https://wikidiff.com/nonapplicable/inapplicable




Cheers,

David MacDonald



*Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.*

Tel:  613-806-9005

LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100>

twitter.com/davidmacd

GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald>

www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/>



*  Adapting the web to all users*
*            Including those with disabilities*

If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy
<http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>


On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 2:11 PM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
wrote:

> Call For Consensus — ends Friday 19th at 2pm Boston time.
>
> The Working Group has discussed the publication of the ACT Rules format
> 1.0, transitioning from Candidate Recommendation to Proposed Recommendation.
>
> This call is for approval of publishing the Rules Format 1.0.
>
> ACT Rules Format editors' draft:
> https://w3c.github.io/wcag-act/act-rules-format.html
> Diff between editors' draft and CR:
> https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2F2019%2FCR-act-rules-format-1.0-20190416%2F&doc2=https%3A%2F%2Fw3c.github.io%2Fwcag-act%2Fact-rules-format.html
> Implementation report:
> https://w3c.github.io/wcag-act/act-implementations.html
>
> Call minutes: https://www.w3.org/2019/07/16-ag-minutes.html#item01
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
> the CfC deadline.
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> -Alastair
>
> --
>
> www.nomensa.com / @alastc
>