RE: Re[2]: Response to issue 697 on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions

+1 to Josh

-----Original Message-----
From: Joshue O Connor - InterAccess [mailto:josh@interaccess.ie] 
Sent: dinsdag 16 januari 2018 11:30
To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>; Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: Re[2]: Response to issue 697 on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions

My own preference is for a more narrow focussed definition that makes the SC effective when covering the use cases it was designed for.

Thanks

Josh

------ Original Message ------
From: "Alastair Campbell" <acampbell@nomensa.com>
To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>; "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" 
<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Sent: 16/01/2018 10:16:04
Subject: Re: Response to issue 697 on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions

>We started with motion & scaling animations, that got changed to the 
>general animations (intentionally, to cover more aspects):
>https://www.w3.org/2017/12/21-ag-minutes.html#item05

>
>Accepted Jan 3rd:
>https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2018JanMar/0029.html

>
>I’d be happy emphasising motion-type animations in the definition 
>without excluding others, but it seems the choice is either:
>- Undo the previous decision, or
>- Widen the explicit scope of the definition.
>
>-Alastair
>
>
>On 16/01/2018, 08:06, "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>
>wrote:
>
>    In that case:
>
>    -1 this definition only mentions movement/size, whereas animation 
>as a
>    concept (particularly in web design/development) cover a wide range 
>of
>    changes (including "color animation", "opacity animation", etc). 
>Either
>    the definition needs to make it clear that it's taking a subset and 
>only
>    considering movement/size, OR the definition needs to encompass all
>    forms of animation and the SC needs to then be scoped to only cover
>    "motion animation" or similar.
>
>    P
>
>



-----------------------------------------------------------------
ATTENTION:
The information in this e-mail is confidential and only meant for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, don't use or disclose it in any way. Please let the sender know and delete the message immediately.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Tuesday, 16 January 2018 10:43:03 UTC