w3c-wai-gl@w3.org from January to March 2018 by author

Abma, J.D. (Jake)

• RE: AGWG agenda Thurs 29th March 2018 (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Agenda - 27th March 2018 (Tuesday, 27 March)
• RE: Forcing session timeout (Monday, 19 March)
• Forcing session timeout (Monday, 19 March)
• RE: CFC - Move 3.2.6 to 4.1 (Friday, 16 March)
• RE: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is (Friday, 16 March)
• RE: CFC - response to issue 757, Units used by Reflow SC (Friday, 16 March)
• RE: Agenda Thursday WCAG call March 8, 2018 @ 12PM ET (Thursday, 8 March)
• RE: Timeline to get WCAG 2.1 to Rec (Wednesday, 7 March)
• RE: Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: Agenda for Tuesday Feb 27 teleconference (Monday, 26 February)
• Can't scribe 27th (Sunday, 25 February)
• RE: Agenda for Tuesday Feb 20 teleconference (Wednesday, 21 February)
• RE: Agenda Thursday February 15 conference (Wednesday, 14 February)
• RE: CFC - Resolving issues 733, 744, 745, 746, 747 (Wednesday, 7 February)
• RE: "auto" response to new issues in Github (Friday, 2 February)
• RE: Volunteers for initial proposals to edit Abstract/introduction (Wednesday, 31 January)
• RE: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation (Friday, 26 January)
• RE: Trying to be clear - was making the draft for CR accurate (Friday, 26 January)
• RE: Keeping Target Size (Enhanced)? Even with 22px? (Sunday, 21 January)
• RE: Keeping Target Size (Enhanced)? Even with 22px? (Sunday, 21 January)
• RE: Agenda for Thursday January 18 call (Thursday, 18 January)
• RE: CFC - Target Size (2 options) (Thursday, 18 January)
• RE: Here's where we are at 3pm Wednesday (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Target size proposal (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Target size proposal (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Target size proposal (Wednesday, 17 January)
• RE: Target size proposal (Wednesday, 17 January)
• RE: Re[2]: Target size proposal (Wednesday, 17 January)
• RE: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Wednesday, 17 January)
• RE: Created branch with proposed wording for 1.3.4 (Wednesday, 17 January)
• RE: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Wednesday, 17 January)
• RE: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Wednesday, 17 January)
• RE: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Wednesday, 17 January)
• RE: Target size proposal (Wednesday, 17 January)
• RE: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Wednesday, 17 January)
• RE: Target size proposal (Wednesday, 17 January)
• RE: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Wednesday, 17 January)
• RE: Target size proposal (Wednesday, 17 January)
• RE: Re[2]: Finding agreement on common purpose (Tuesday, 16 January)
• RE: CFC - Response to issue 211: Learning Disabilities of America - Technology Committee Comments: WCAG 2.1 For Learning Disabilities and Cognitive Disabilities (Tuesday, 16 January)
• RE: Re[2]: Response to issue 697 on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions (Tuesday, 16 January)
• RE: What can I do, you may ask? (Tuesday, 16 January)
• RE: Agenda for Tuesday January 16 meeting (Tuesday, 16 January)
• RE: What can I do, you may ask? (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Agenda for Tuesday January 16, 2018 call (Monday, 15 January)
• RE: CSUN F2F (Monday, 15 January)
• RE: CFC - Response to issue 670 "SC 2.4.12 Label in Name - Proposal for change of wording" (Monday, 15 January)
• RE: CFC - Response to issue 697: The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions (Monday, 15 January)
• RE: CFC - Response to issue 667: SC 2.2.8 Timeouts - Proposal for change of wording (Monday, 15 January)
• RE: CFC - Response to issue 598: Exit criteria technology-specific? (Monday, 15 January)
• RE: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Sunday, 14 January)
• RE: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• RE: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• RE: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• RE: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• RE: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• RE: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• RE: Need Clarification on #170 (Friday, 12 January)
• RE: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 (Thursday, 11 January)
• RE: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 (Thursday, 11 January)
• RE: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 (Thursday, 11 January)
• RE: CFC - Response to Issues 296 and 315 (Thursday, 11 January)
• RE: CFC - Description for Guideline 6.2 (Thursday, 11 January)
• RE: CFC - Changes to Target Definition for Issues 671 and 261 (Thursday, 11 January)
• RE: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 (Thursday, 11 January)
• RE: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Wednesday, 10 January)
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Wednesday, 10 January)
• RE: CFC - Response to issue 656 and 644 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• RE: CFC - Response to Issue 520 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Wednesday, 10 January)
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Tuesday, 9 January)
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Tuesday, 9 January)
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Tuesday, 9 January)
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Tuesday, 9 January)
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Tuesday, 9 January)
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Tuesday, 9 January)
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Monday, 8 January)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Sunday, 7 January)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Sunday, 7 January)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Sunday, 7 January)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Sunday, 7 January)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Sunday, 7 January)
• RE: CFC - Issue 150 response (Thursday, 4 January)
• RE: CFC - Adding identifiers to Common Purpose lists (Thursday, 4 January)
• RE: CFC - Issue 619 response (Thursday, 4 January)
• RE: CFC - Issue 630 response (Thursday, 4 January)

Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Issue Tracker

• ISSUE-52: 806 (Tuesday, 20 March)
• ISSUE-51: 772 (Tuesday, 20 March)
• WCAG-ACTION-341: Write a new definition for "new" for https://www.w3.org/tr/wcag21/#commonpurposes (Tuesday, 2 January)

ALAN SMITH

• RE: WCAG needs to do this - Any user testing of WCAG 2.1 at CSUN (Monday, 5 March)
• RE: WCAG needs to do this - Any user testing of WCAG 2.1 at CSUN (Saturday, 3 March)
• WCAG needs to do this - Any user testing of WCAG 2.1 at CSUN (Friday, 2 March)
• RE: Any user testing of WCAG 2.1 at CSUN (Monday, 26 February)
• RE: Any user testing of WCAG 2.1 at CSUN (Thursday, 22 February)
• RE: Any user testing of WCAG 2.1 at CSUN (Thursday, 22 February)
• A lasting impact on the industry - Any user testing of WCAG 2.1 at CSUN (Thursday, 22 February)
• Any user testing of WCAG 2.1 at CSUN (Wednesday, 21 February)

Alastair Campbell

• RE: 1.3.5 from Mark (Friday, 30 March)
• RE: 1.3.5 from Mark (Friday, 30 March)
• RE: 1.3.5 from Mark (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: Agenda - 27th March 2018 (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Agenda - 27th March 2018 (Monday, 26 March)
• RE: CFC - response to issue 757, Units used by Reflow SC (Monday, 19 March)
• RE: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is (Thursday, 15 March)
• RE: Thursday March 15 AGWG Teleconference (Thursday, 15 March)
• CFC - response to issue 757, Units used by Reflow SC (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Agenda Thursday WCAG call March 13, 2018 @ 11PM ET (Friday, 9 March)
• Agenda Thursday WCAG call March 13, 2018 @ 11PM ET (Friday, 9 March)
• Heading update on QuiickRef (Thursday, 8 March)
• Placement of 1.3.4 (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Agenda Thursday WCAG call March 8, 2018 @ 12PM ET (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Security of Autocomplete (Wednesday, 7 March)
• RE: SC 1.3.4 Another consideration? (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - Understanding doc update (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: Security of Autocomplete - Good News! (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: Security of Autocomplete - Good News! (Wednesday, 28 February)
• RE: SC 1.3.4 - Understanding doc update (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - to keep or not? (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - to keep or not? (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - to keep or not? (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - to keep or not? (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - to keep or not? (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: Any user testing of WCAG 2.1 at CSUN (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC (Thursday, 22 February)
• RE: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC (Wednesday, 21 February)
• RE: CFC - response to issue 760 (Wednesday, 21 February)
• RE: CFC - Response to 756 (Wednesday, 21 February)
• RE: CFC - Response to Issue 759 (Wednesday, 21 February)
• RE: CFC - response to issue 758 (Wednesday, 21 February)
• RE: CFC - Response to Issue 759 (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC (Tuesday, 20 February)
• RE: Response to Issue #761 (Wednesday, 7 February)
• RE: AGENDA for AGWG teleconference, Tuesday Feb 6 (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? (Thursday, 1 February)
• RE: Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: Example icons for non-text contrast (Wednesday, 24 January)
• Example icons for non-text contrast (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Updating understanding docs (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Re: Keeping Target Size (Enhanced)? Even with 22px? (Tuesday, 23 January)
• RE: CFC - Identify Common Controls, Identify Controls, and Issue responses (Thursday, 18 January)
• RE: Reflow and aspect ratio (Thursday, 18 January)
• RE: CFC - Updated Response to issues 649, 616, 411, 282, 680, and 686 on Graphics Contrast (Thursday, 18 January)
• RE: CFC - Target Size (2 options) (Thursday, 18 January)
• RE: CFC - Updated Response to issue 650/655/695/711 on Content on Hover or Focus (Thursday, 18 January)
• RE: CFC - Response to issue 674 (1st Note in SC 1.4.10 Reflow) and Reflow edits (Thursday, 18 January)
• RE: CFC - Updated Response to issue 634 and 663 on Pointer Gestures (Thursday, 18 January)
• RE: Animation from Interactions - ease-in-out (Thursday, 18 January)
• RE: notes on 320 CSS Pixels to inches (Thursday, 18 January)
• RE: CFC - Response to issue 697 (The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions) (Thursday, 18 January)
• RE: Proposal for: Animation from Interactions (Thursday, 18 January)
• RE: notes on 320 CSS Pixels to inches (Thursday, 18 January)
• RE: CFC - Updated Response to issues 649, 616, 411, 282, 680, and 686 on Graphics Contrast (Thursday, 18 January)
• RE: Proposal for: Animation from Interactions (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: Graphics Contrast responses (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Created branch with proposed wording for 1.3.4 (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Created branch with proposed wording for 1.3.4 (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Created branch with proposed wording for 1.3.4 (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Created branch with proposed wording for 1.3.4 (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Re[2]: Proposal for: Animation from Interactions (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Proposal for: Animation from Interactions (Wednesday, 17 January)
• RE: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Target size proposal (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Proposal for: Animation from Interactions (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: Re[2]: Finding agreement on common purpose (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: Response to issue 697 on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: Re[2]: Response to issue 697 on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: Response to issue 697 on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: What can I do, you may ask? (Tuesday, 16 January)
• RE: What can I do, you may ask? (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Responses to issues 657, 677, and 685 on text spacing (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 697: The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 667: SC 2.2.8 Timeouts - Proposal for change of wording (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 670 "SC 2.4.12 Label in Name - Proposal for change of wording" (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: What can I do, you may ask? (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 598: Exit criteria technology-specific? (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: Dealy in "Common Purposes" (Monday, 15 January)
• RE: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Sunday, 14 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: New Thread: Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 (Thursday, 11 January)
• RE: CFC - Description for Guideline 6.2 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• RE: New Thread: Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: Response to Issue 659/660/386 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Wednesday, 10 January)
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Tuesday, 9 January)
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: UPDATED Agenda AGWG meeting, Tuesday January 9, 2018 (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Tuesday, 9 January)
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Sunday, 7 January)
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Saturday, 6 January)
• Re: Response to Issue 659/660/386 (Friday, 5 January)
• Re: Response to Issue 659/660/386 (Friday, 5 January)
• Cross domain complexity, was: Accessible Authentication and issue responses (Wednesday, 3 January)
• Re: Agenda for Tuesday January 2, 2018 call (Tuesday, 2 January)
• Re: Accessible Authentication and issue responses (Tuesday, 2 January)
• Re: Accessible Authentication and issue responses (Tuesday, 2 January)
• Re: Accessible Authentication and issue responses (Tuesday, 2 January)

Alex Li (CELA)

• RE: CFC - Updated Response to issues 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts (Thursday, 18 January)
• RE: CFC - Target Size (2 options) (Thursday, 18 January)
• RE: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• RE: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 (Thursday, 11 January)
• RE: editorial to incorporate exception into main SC text for 1.4.13 (Saturday, 6 January)
• editorial to incorporate exception into main SC text for 1.4.13 (Friday, 5 January)

Andreas Savva

• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? (Thursday, 1 February)

Andrew Kirkpatrick

• Re: CFC - Move 3.2.6 to 4.1 (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: Renaming the Guideline it falls under. (was Re: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is) (Thursday, 15 March)
• CFC - Move 3.2.6 to 4.1 (Thursday, 15 March)
• CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is (Thursday, 15 March)
• Agenda for F2F Monday and Tuesday March 19-20 (Thursday, 15 March)
• Thursday March 15 AGWG Teleconference (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: CFC - response to issue 757, Units used by Reflow SC (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Projector for CSUN (Friday, 9 March)
• Agenda Thursday WCAG call March 8, 2018 @ 12PM ET (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Is wikipedia really an example of a fail for 2.4.12? (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Fwd: Agenda: Tuesday March 6, 2018 Teleconference (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Cal for today? Agenda for (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Fwd: Agenda: Tuesday March 6, 2018 Teleconference (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Minutes from March 1 2018 call (Thursday, 1 March)
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - Understanding doc update (Thursday, 1 March)
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - Understanding doc update (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - Understanding doc update (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - Understanding doc update (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Agenda for Thursday March 1 teleconference - 12pm ET (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: CFC - Issue 761 (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: CFC - response to issue 758 (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: CFC - Response to 756 (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: CFC - Permission to publish draft of rules format and updated demo rules site. (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: CFC - Response to Issue 759 (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: CFC - response to issue 760 (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Agenda for Tuesday Feb 27 teleconference (Monday, 26 February)
• CFC - Response to 756 (Tuesday, 20 February)
• CFC - response to issue 758 (Tuesday, 20 February)
• CFC - Response to Issue 759 (Tuesday, 20 February)
• CFC - Issue 761 (Tuesday, 20 February)
• CFC - response to issue 760 (Tuesday, 20 February)
• CFC - Permission to publish draft of rules format and updated demo rules site. (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: CFC - Resolving issues 733, 744, 745, 746, 747 (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Agenda for Tuesday Feb 20 teleconference (Tuesday, 20 February)
• We have a location for the face to face (Thursday, 15 February)
• Agenda Thursday February 15 conference (Wednesday, 14 February)
• UPDATED Agenda Tuesday February 13, 2018 (Monday, 12 February)
• Agenda Tuesday February 13, 2018 (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: objections RE: CFC - Resolving issues 733, 744, 745, 746, 747 (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: Response to Issue #761 (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Detlev question about response to 733 (Wednesday, 7 February)
• No Thursday call this week (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Response to Issue #761 (Wednesday, 7 February)
• CFC - Resolving issues 733, 744, 745, 746, 747 (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis (Monday, 5 February)
• AGENDA for AGWG teleconference, Tuesday Feb 6 (Monday, 5 February)
• CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis (Thursday, 1 February)
• "auto" response to new issues in Github (Thursday, 1 February)
• Agenda Thursday AG WG call - 12:00pm (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? (Wednesday, 31 January)
• Volunteers for initial proposals to edit Abstract/introduction (Tuesday, 30 January)
• AGENDA AG WG Teleconference Tuesday 29 January (Monday, 29 January)
• Re: OBJECTION Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: Anyone else having trouble logging in to answer the WCAG 2.1 CR survey (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: Anyone else having trouble logging in to answer the WCAG 2.1 CR survey (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: making the draft for CR accurate (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: CFC - Final issue responses for CR (Wednesday, 24 January)
• Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation (Tuesday, 23 January)
• CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Re: Re[2]: Keeping Target Size (Enhanced)? Even with 22px? (Tuesday, 23 January)
• AGENDA - AGWG call Tuesday, January 23rd (Monday, 22 January)
• CFC - Final issue responses for CR (Monday, 22 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 211: Learning Disabilities of America - Technology Committee Comments: WCAG 2.1 For Learning Disabilities and Cognitive Disabilities (Monday, 22 January)
• CFC - Transition WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation (Saturday, 20 January)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issue 634 and 663 on Pointer Gestures (Saturday, 20 January)
• Re: CFC - Responses to issues 657, 677, and 685 on text spacing (Saturday, 20 January)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 649, 616, 411, 282, 680, and 686 on Graphics Contrast (Saturday, 20 January)
• Re: CFC - Target Size (2 options) (Saturday, 20 January)
• Re: CFC - Identify Common Controls, Identify Controls, and Issue responses (Saturday, 20 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 674 (1st Note in SC 1.4.10 Reflow) and Reflow edits (Saturday, 20 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 697 (The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions) (Saturday, 20 January)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts (Saturday, 20 January)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issue 650/655/695/711 on Content on Hover or Focus (Saturday, 20 January)
• Re: 1.3.4, autocomplete and esignatures (Friday, 19 January)
• Agenda for Thursday January 18 call (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 649, 616, 411, 282, 680, and 686 on Graphics Contrast (Thursday, 18 January)
• CFC - Target Size (2 options) (Thursday, 18 January)
• CFC - Identify Common Controls, Identify Controls, and Issue responses (Thursday, 18 January)
• CFC - Response to issue 674 (1st Note in SC 1.4.10 Reflow) and Reflow edits (Thursday, 18 January)
• CFC - Updated Response to issues 649, 616, 411, 282, 680, and 686 on Graphics Contrast (Thursday, 18 January)
• CFC - Response to issue 697 (The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions) (Thursday, 18 January)
• CFC - Updated Response to issues 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts (Thursday, 18 January)
• CFC - Updated Response to issue 650/655/695/711 on Content on Hover or Focus (Thursday, 18 January)
• CFC - Updated Response to issue 634 and 663 on Pointer Gestures (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: side conversation on 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Here's where we are at 3pm Wednesday (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: [w3c-wai-gl] <none> (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Target size proposal (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Target size proposal (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: side conversation on 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts (Wednesday, 17 January)
• side conversation on 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: CFC - Responses to issues 620, 621, and 676 on user motion (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 670 "SC 2.4.12 Label in Name - Proposal for change of wording" (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 634 and 663 on Pointer Gestures (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 667: SC 2.2.8 Timeouts - Proposal for change of wording (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 162: Multi-document publications and meaningful sequence (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to Issue 589 (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 598: Exit criteria technology-specific? (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Created branch with proposed wording for 1.3.4 (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Target size proposal (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: CFC - Responses to issues 657, 677, and 685 on text spacing (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Please be on time for the call today (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose (Tuesday, 16 January)
• pointer Gestures (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 697: The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 211: Learning Disabilities of America - Technology Committee Comments: WCAG 2.1 For Learning Disabilities and Cognitive Disabilities (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issues 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: Issue 719 (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose (Monday, 15 January)
• Finding agreement on common purpose (Monday, 15 January)
• Pointer SC questions (Monday, 15 January)
• Agenda for Tuesday January 16 meeting (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Responses to issues 657, 677, and 685 on text spacing (Monday, 15 January)
• What can I do, you may ask? (Monday, 15 January)
• CFC - Response to issues 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts (Monday, 15 January)
• CFC - Response to issue 598: Exit criteria technology-specific? (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Responses to issues 657, 677, and 685 on text spacing (Monday, 15 January)
• CFC - Response to issue 211: Learning Disabilities of America - Technology Committee Comments: WCAG 2.1 For Learning Disabilities and Cognitive Disabilities (Monday, 15 January)
• CFC - Response to issue 162: Multi-document publications and meaningful sequence (Monday, 15 January)
• CFC - Response to issue 634 and 663 on Pointer Gestures (Monday, 15 January)
• CFC - Response to issue 697: The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions (Monday, 15 January)
• CFC - Response to issue 667: SC 2.2.8 Timeouts - Proposal for change of wording (Monday, 15 January)
• CFC - Responses to issues 657, 677, and 685 on text spacing (Monday, 15 January)
• CFC - Response to issue 670 "SC 2.4.12 Label in Name - Proposal for change of wording" (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Description for Guideline 6.2 (Monday, 15 January)
• CFC - Responses to issues 620, 621, and 676 on user motion (Sunday, 14 January)
• Re: Dealy in "Common Purposes" (Sunday, 14 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to Issue 589 (Sunday, 14 January)
• Re: Objection Re: CFC - Response to Issue 520 (Sunday, 14 January)
• Re: Objection Re: CFC - Response to Issue 520 (Sunday, 14 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to Issues 296 and 315 (Sunday, 14 January)
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 (Sunday, 14 January)
• Re: CFC - Description for Guideline 6.2 (Sunday, 14 January)
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Definition for Issues 671 and 261 (Sunday, 14 January)
• Re: Public comments in Japanese (Sunday, 14 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Objection Re: CFC - Response to Issue 520 (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• CSUN F2F (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• Move 3.2.6 Status changes to the Adaptable guideline? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to Issue 520 (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: CFC - response to issue 408 (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 656 and 644 (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: CFC - response to Issue 605 (Thursday, 11 January)
• Meeting minutes (Thursday, 11 January)
• CFC - Response to Issue 589 (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: Agenda for Thursday January 11, 2018 call (Thursday, 11 January)
• Addressing issue 667 / Timeouts (Thursday, 11 January)
• Agenda for Thursday January 11, 2018 call (Thursday, 11 January)
• Updates to Respond to Motion Actuation comments (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Definition for Issues 671 and 261 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• CFC - Changes to Target Definition for Issues 671 and 261 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• CFC - Description for Guideline 6.2 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• CFC - Response to Issues 296 and 315 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: Response to Issue 659/660/386 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Guideline 2.6 text (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Agenda for Extra WCAG call Wednesday January 10, 2018 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Tuesday, 9 January)
• CFC - Response to Issue 520 (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: Issue 520 (Tuesday, 9 January)
• CFC - response to Issue 605 (Tuesday, 9 January)
• CFC - Response to issue 656 and 644 (Tuesday, 9 January)
• CFC - response to issue 408 (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: Need Clarification on #170 (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: CFC - Resolving issues #1 (Monday, 8 January)
• Re: UPDATED Agenda AGWG meeting, Tuesday January 9, 2018 (Monday, 8 January)
• UPDATED Agenda AGWG meeting, Tuesday January 9, 2018 (Monday, 8 January)
• Agenda AGWG meeting, Tuesday January 9, 2018 (Monday, 8 January)
• Re: Extra meeting on Wednesday 11am-1pm ET (Monday, 8 January)
• Re: CFC - Issue 630 response (Monday, 8 January)
• Re: CFC - Issue 619 response (Monday, 8 January)
• Re: CFC - Issue 150 response (Monday, 8 January)
• Extra meeting on Wednesday 11am-1pm ET (Monday, 8 January)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Monday, 8 January)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Sunday, 7 January)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Sunday, 7 January)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Sunday, 7 January)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Saturday, 6 January)
• Re: editorial to incorporate exception into main SC text for 1.4.13 (Saturday, 6 January)
• Re: editorial to incorporate exception into main SC text for 1.4.13 (Saturday, 6 January)
• Re: editorial to incorporate exception into main SC text for 1.4.13 (Saturday, 6 January)
• Re: editorial to incorporate exception into main SC text for 1.4.13 (Friday, 5 January)
• Re: WCAG-ACTION-341: Write a new definition for "new" for https://www.w3.org/tr/wcag21/#commonpurposes (Friday, 5 January)
• extra call next week (Friday, 5 January)
• Re: Response to Issue 659/660/386 (Friday, 5 January)
• Response to Issue 659/660/386 (Thursday, 4 January)
• AGWG @ CSUN 2018? (Thursday, 4 January)
• Minutes from 1/4/18 call (Thursday, 4 January)
• AGENDA for AGWG call Thursday, January 4, 2018 (Wednesday, 3 January)
• Re: [w3c/wcag21] IBM comment 3 on 1.3.5 Contextual Information (#430) (Wednesday, 3 January)
• Identifiers (Wednesday, 3 January)
• Re: CFC - Accessible Authentication and issue responses (Wednesday, 3 January)
• Re: CFC - Animation from Interactions and issue responses (Wednesday, 3 January)
• Re: CFC - Identify Purpose SC and issue responses (Wednesday, 3 January)
• CFC - Issue 150 response (Wednesday, 3 January)
• CFC - Issue 630 response (Wednesday, 3 January)
• CFC - Issue 619 response (Wednesday, 3 January)
• CFC - Adding identifiers to Common Purpose lists (Wednesday, 3 January)
• Agenda for Tuesday January 2, 2018 call (Monday, 1 January)

Bailey, Bruce

• RE: Agenda - 27th March 2018 (Tuesday, 27 March)
• RE: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is (Thursday, 15 March)
• RE: Agenda: Tuesday March 6, 2018 Teleconference (Tuesday, 6 March)
• RE: Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG (Tuesday, 27 February)
• RE: AGENDA for AGWG teleconference, Tuesday Feb 6 (Tuesday, 6 February)
• RE: Agenda Thursday AG WG call - 12:00pm (Thursday, 1 February)
• RE: CFC - Final issue responses for CR (Monday, 22 January)
• RE: Agenda for Tuesday January 16 meeting (Tuesday, 16 January)
• RE: Agenda for Thursday January 11, 2018 call (Thursday, 11 January)
• RE: Agenda for Extra WCAG call Wednesday January 10, 2018 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• RE: Agenda for Tuesday January 2, 2018 call (Tuesday, 2 January)

Bradley Montgomery, Rachael L.

• Minutes 27 March 2017 (Tuesday, 27 March)
• RE: Anyone want to volunteer to evaluate dequeuniversity.com (public) for WCAG 2.1 AA? (Tuesday, 27 March)
• RE: Thursday March 15 AGWG Teleconference (Thursday, 15 March)
• RE: 2.2.6 Timeouts versus 2.2.1 Timing Adjustable (Wednesday, 28 February)
• RE: Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG (Wednesday, 28 February)
• RE: Unsupported Autofill values and Common Purpose (Monday, 19 February)
• RE: AGENDA for AGWG teleconference, Tuesday Feb 6 (Tuesday, 6 February)
• RE: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? (Thursday, 1 February)
• RE: AGENDA - AGWG call Tuesday, January 23rd (Tuesday, 23 January)
• RE: UPDATED Agenda AGWG meeting, Tuesday January 9, 2018 (Tuesday, 9 January)

Brooks.Newton@thomsonreuters.com

• RE: Agenda - 27th March 2018 (Monday, 26 March)
• RE: CFC - Move 3.2.6 to 4.1 (Monday, 19 March)
• RE: Agenda Thursday WCAG call March 13, 2018 @ 11PM ET (Tuesday, 13 March)
• RE: Heading update on QuiickRef (Friday, 9 March)
• RE: Agenda Thursday WCAG call March 8, 2018 @ 12PM ET (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Question about individual SC implementation evaluations (Wednesday, 7 March)
• RE: Is wikipedia really an example of a fail for 2.4.12? (Tuesday, 6 March)
• RE: Is wikipedia really an example of a fail for 2.4.12? (Monday, 5 March)
• RE: Is wikipedia really an example of a fail for 2.4.12? (Monday, 5 March)
• RE: Agenda for Tuesday Feb 27 teleconference (Tuesday, 27 February)
• RE: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC (Wednesday, 21 February)
• RE: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC (Wednesday, 21 February)
• RE: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC (Tuesday, 20 February)
• RE: AGENDA for AGWG teleconference, Tuesday Feb 6 (Monday, 5 February)
• RE: "auto" response to new issues in Github (Friday, 2 February)
• RE: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis (Friday, 2 February)
• RE: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? (Wednesday, 31 January)
• RE: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? (Wednesday, 31 January)
• RE: Agenda for Thursday January 18 call (Thursday, 18 January)
• RE: Agenda for Tuesday January 16 meeting (Tuesday, 16 January)
• RE: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Tuesday, 9 January)
• RE: Telecon info Re: Extra meeting on Wednesday 11am-1pm ET (Tuesday, 9 January)
• RE: CFC - Issue 630 response (Thursday, 4 January)

Chaals Nevile

• Re: Security of Autocomplete - Good News! (Wednesday, 28 February)

Chakravarthula, Srinivasu

• Re: CFC - Move 3.2.6 to 4.1 (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: "auto" response to new issues in Github (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? (Thursday, 1 February)

Chris O'Brien

• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? (Wednesday, 31 January)

Chuck Adams

• RE: 1.3.5 from Mark (Friday, 30 March)
• RE: 1.3.5 from Mark (Friday, 30 March)
• RE: 1.3.5 from Mark (Friday, 30 March)
• RE: AGWG agenda Thurs 29th March 2018 (Thursday, 29 March)
• RE: Agenda - 27th March 2018 (Monday, 26 March)
• RE: Thursday March 15 AGWG Teleconference (Thursday, 15 March)
• RE: Projector for CSUN (Sunday, 11 March)
• RE: Projector for CSUN (Saturday, 10 March)
• RE: Finding examples which demonstrate "Concurrent Input Mechanisms" (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Finding examples which demonstrate "Concurrent Input Mechanisms" (Wednesday, 14 February)

Daman Wandke

• Update on My Work (Thursday, 1 March)

David MacDonald

• What's the address where we meet tomorrow in San Diego? (Sunday, 18 March)
• Re: CFC - response to issue 757, Units used by Reflow SC (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Heading update on QuiickRef (Friday, 9 March)
• Minutes March 6 (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Security of Autocomplete - Good News! (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: Unsupported Autofill values and Common Purpose (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Unsupported Autofill values and Common Purpose (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: CFC - Resolving issues 733, 744, 745, 746, 747 (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: "auto" response to new issues in Github (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? (Wednesday, 31 January)
• Re: CFC - Final issue responses for CR (Monday, 22 January)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts (Friday, 19 January)
• Re: CFC - Identify Common Controls, Identify Controls, and Issue responses (Friday, 19 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 674 (1st Note in SC 1.4.10 Reflow) and Reflow edits (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 697 (The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions) (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issue 650/655/695/711 on Content on Hover or Focus (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Target Size (2 options) (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issue 634 and 663 on Pointer Gestures (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Identify Common Controls, Identify Controls, and Issue responses (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: Here's where we are at 3pm Wednesday (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: side conversation on 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Here's where we are at 3pm Wednesday (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: side conversation on 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts (Wednesday, 17 January)
• [w3c-wai-gl] <none> (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Target size proposal (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Target size proposal (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Created branch with proposed wording for 1.3.4 (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Created branch with proposed wording for 1.3.4 (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Created branch with proposed wording for 1.3.4 (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Created branch with proposed wording for 1.3.4 (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Created branch with proposed wording for 1.3.4 (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Created branch with proposed wording for 1.3.4 (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Created branch with proposed wording for 1.3.4 (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Target size proposal (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Content on Hover or Focus (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Proposal for: Animation from Interactions (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Target size proposal (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Target size proposal (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Proposal for: Animation from Interactions (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: CFC - Responses to issues 657, 677, and 685 on text spacing (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: viewport/browser window size does not imply presence/lack of touch input... (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: viewport/browser window size does not imply presence/lack of touch input... (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: viewport/browser window size does not imply presence/lack of touch input... (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: Re[2]: What can I do, you may ask? (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: What can I do, you may ask? (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: Issue 719 (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: Dealy in "Common Purposes" (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: Draft resonses to issues #715 and #717 (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: Dealy in "Common Purposes" (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 211: Learning Disabilities of America - Technology Committee Comments: WCAG 2.1 For Learning Disabilities and Cognitive Disabilities (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: Dealy in "Common Purposes" (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Responses to issues 657, 677, and 685 on text spacing (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 667: SC 2.2.8 Timeouts - Proposal for change of wording (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 697: The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 634 and 663 on Pointer Gestures (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 670 "SC 2.4.12 Label in Name - Proposal for change of wording" (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Sunday, 14 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Sunday, 14 January)
• Re: Dealy in "Common Purposes" (Sunday, 14 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Saturday, 13 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Saturday, 13 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Re[2]: Move 3.2.6 Status changes to the Adaptable guideline? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Need Clarification on #170 (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: Need Clarification on #170 (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: Addressing issue 667 / Timeouts (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: Updates to Respond to Motion Actuation comments (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: Need Clarification on #170 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to Issues 296 and 315 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: CFC - Description for Guideline 6.2 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Definition for Issues 671 and 261 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 656 and 644 (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to Issue 520 (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Updated spreadsheet of SCs (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Issue 520 (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: Extra meeting on Wednesday 11am-1pm ET (Monday, 8 January)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Monday, 8 January)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Monday, 8 January)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Sunday, 7 January)
• Re: editorial to incorporate exception into main SC text for 1.4.13 (Sunday, 7 January)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Sunday, 7 January)
• Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Saturday, 6 January)
• Re: WCAG-ACTION-341: Write a new definition for "new" for https://www.w3.org/tr/wcag21/#commonpurposes (Friday, 5 January)
• Re: Response to Issue 659/660/386 (Friday, 5 January)
• Re: CFC - Accessible Authentication and issue responses (-1, objection) (Wednesday, 3 January)
• Re: CFC - Adding identifiers to Common Purpose lists (Wednesday, 3 January)
• Re: CFC - Issue 619 response (Wednesday, 3 January)
• Re: CFC - Issue 630 response (Wednesday, 3 January)

Denis Boudreau

• Re: Renaming the Guideline it falls under. (was Re: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is) (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: CFC - Move 3.2.6 to 4.1 (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: CFC - Response to 756 (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: CFC - Response to Issue 759 (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: CFC - response to issue 758 (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: CFC - response to issue 760 (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? (Wednesday, 31 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 697: The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 598: Exit criteria technology-specific? (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Definition for Issues 671 and 261 (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to Issues 296 and 315 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: CFC - Description for Guideline 6.2 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: CFC - Adding identifiers to Common Purpose lists (Wednesday, 3 January)
• Re: CFC - Issue 619 response (Wednesday, 3 January)
• Re: CFC - Issue 630 response (Wednesday, 3 January)
• Re: CFC - Issue 150 response (Wednesday, 3 January)

Detlev (testkreis)

• Re: Detlev question about response to 733 (Thursday, 8 February)

Detlev Fischer

• Re: CFC - Move 3.2.6 to 4.1 (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: CFC - response to issue 757, Units used by Reflow SC (Thursday, 15 March)
• Small editorial changes to draft responses to issue #721 (RNIB) (Monday, 22 January)
• Re: Here's where we are at 3pm Wednesday (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Target size proposal (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Updates to Respond to Motion Actuation comments (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to Issues 296 and 315 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: CFC - Description for Guideline 6.2 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: Guideline 2.6 text (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: Guideline 2.6 text (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: editorial to incorporate exception into main SC text for 1.4.13 (Saturday, 6 January)
• Re: AGENDA for AGWG call Thursday, January 4, 2018 (Wednesday, 3 January)

Detlev Fischer (TK)

• Re: CFC - Permission to publish draft of rules format and updated demo rules site. (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: CFC - response to issue 760 (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: CFC - Response to Issue 759 (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: CFC - response to issue 758 (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: CFC - Response to 756 (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: CFC - Resolving issues 733, 744, 745, 746, 747 (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: AGENDA AG WG Teleconference Tuesday 29 January (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: AGENDA - AGWG call Tuesday, January 23rd (Monday, 22 January)
• Re: Agenda for Thursday January 18 call (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: On The Side: (was Re: CFC - Updated Response to issue 650/655/695/711 on Content on Hover or Focus) (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issue 650/655/695/711 on Content on Hover or Focus (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 649, 616, 411, 282, 680, and 686 on Graphics Contrast (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 674 (1st Note in SC 1.4.10 Reflow) and Reflow edits (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Target Size (2 options) (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 649, 616, 411, 282, 680, and 686 on Graphics Contrast (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 697 (The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions) (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issue 650/655/695/711 on Content on Hover or Focus (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issue 634 and 663 on Pointer Gestures (Thursday, 18 January)
• Draft Response for #721 (RNIB): Seven issues remain where I need your help... (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: viewport/browser window size does not imply presence/lack of touch input... (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Draft resonses to issues #715 and #717 (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: What can I do, you may ask? (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Responses to issues 620, 621, and 676 on user motion (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Responses to issues 657, 677, and 685 on text spacing (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 667: SC 2.2.8 Timeouts - Proposal for change of wording (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 634 and 663 on Pointer Gestures (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 598: Exit criteria technology-specific? (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 211: Learning Disabilities of America - Technology Committee Comments: WCAG 2.1 For Learning Disabilities and Cognitive Disabilities (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 656 and 644 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: CFC - response to Issue 605 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: Guideline 2.6 text (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Minutes AGWG meeting, Tuesday January 9, 2018 (Tuesday, 9 January)
• single pointer definition updated (Tuesday, 9 January)

EA Draffan

• RE: AGWG agenda Thurs 29th March 2018 (Thursday, 29 March)
• RE: Agenda - 27th March 2018 (Tuesday, 27 March)
• RE: Agenda Thursday WCAG call March 8, 2018 @ 12PM ET (Wednesday, 7 March)
• RE: Security of Autocomplete - Good News! (Wednesday, 28 February)
• RE: Agenda for Tuesday Feb 27 teleconference (Monday, 26 February)
• RE: UPDATED Agenda Tuesday February 13, 2018 (Monday, 12 February)
• RE: Re:RE: AGENDA for AGWG teleconference, Tuesday Feb 6 (Tuesday, 6 February)
• RE: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis (Thursday, 1 February)
• RE: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? (Thursday, 1 February)
• RE: AGENDA AG WG Teleconference Tuesday 29 January (Monday, 29 January)
• RE: AGENDA - AGWG call Tuesday, January 23rd (Monday, 22 January)
• RE: Agenda for Thursday January 18 call (Thursday, 18 January)
• RE: Agenda for Tuesday January 16 meeting (Tuesday, 16 January)
• RE: CFC - Responses to issues 657, 677, and 685 on text spacing (Monday, 15 January)
• RE: regrets (Monday, 8 January)
• RE: Agenda for Tuesday January 2, 2018 call (Monday, 1 January)

Eric Eggert

• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? (Wednesday, 31 January)

Fredrik Larsson

• Re: AGWG agenda Thurs 29th March 2018 (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Agenda - 27th March 2018 (Monday, 26 March)

Glenda Sims

• Anyone want to volunteer to evaluate dequeuniversity.com (public) for WCAG 2.1 AA? (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: What's the address where we meet tomorrow in San Diego? (Sunday, 18 March)
• Re: What's the address where we meet tomorrow in San Diego? (Sunday, 18 March)
• Re: Placement of 1.3.4 (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Placement of 1.3.4 (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Thursday March 15 AGWG Teleconference (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Cal for today? Agenda for (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Minutes from Thursday Feb 15 AGWG WG Discussion (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: "auto" response to new issues in Github (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? (Wednesday, 31 January)
• Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? (Wednesday, 31 January)
• Re: AGENDA AG WG Teleconference Tuesday 29 January (Tuesday, 30 January)
• Re: Example icons for non-text contrast (Wednesday, 24 January)
• Minutes: AGWG telecon Tuesday, 23 Jan 2018 (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Re: CFC - Final issue responses for CR (Monday, 22 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 162: Multi-document publications and meaningful sequence (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 598: Exit criteria technology-specific? (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 697: The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: What can I do, you may ask? (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to Issue 520 (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Definition for Issues 671 and 261 (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: CFC - Description for Guideline 6.2 (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: Addressing issue 667 / Timeouts (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to Issues 296 and 315 (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: Agenda for Thursday January 11, 2018 call (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: Telecon info Re: Extra meeting on Wednesday 11am-1pm ET (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: AGENDA for AGWG call Thursday, January 4, 2018 (Thursday, 4 January)
• Re: CFC - Adding identifiers to Common Purpose lists (Wednesday, 3 January)
• Re: CFC - Issue 619 response (Wednesday, 3 January)
• Re: CFC - Issue 630 response (Wednesday, 3 January)
• Re: CFC - Issue 150 response (Wednesday, 3 January)

GMAIL: Katie Haritos-Shea

• RE: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics (Friday, 12 January)
• RE: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics (Friday, 12 January)
• RE: CFC - Description for Guideline 6.2 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• RE: CFC - Response to Issues 296 and 315 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• RE: CFC - Response to Issue 520 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• RE: Issue 520 (Tuesday, 9 January)
• RE: CFC - Response to issue 656 and 644 (Tuesday, 9 January)
• RE: CFC - response to Issue 605 (Tuesday, 9 January)

Greg Lowney

• Re: AGWG agenda Thurs 29th March 2018 (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Agenda Thursday WCAG call March 8, 2018 @ 12PM ET (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Agenda Thursday February 15 conference (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: Proposal for: Animation from Interactions (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: Proposal for: Animation from Interactions (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: Agenda for Thursday January 11, 2018 call (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: Agenda for Tuesday January 2, 2018 call (Tuesday, 2 January)

Gregg Vanderheiden GPII

• Re: making the draft for CR accurate (Saturday, 27 January)
• notes on 320 CSS Pixels to inches (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Dealy in "Common Purposes" (Sunday, 14 January)

Hakkinen, Mark T

• Re: notes on 320 CSS Pixels to inches (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: notes on 320 CSS Pixels to inches (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 (Thursday, 11 January)

Ian Pouncey

• Re: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is (Friday, 16 March)

James Nurthen

• RE: Security of Autocomplete - Good News! (Tuesday, 27 February)
• RE: Even for Note-track? Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: Anyone else having trouble logging in to answer the WCAG 2.1 CR survey (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: 1.3.4, autocomplete and esignatures (Friday, 19 January)
• 1.3.4, autocomplete and esignatures (Friday, 19 January)
• Re: Created branch with proposed wording for 1.3.4 (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: side conversation on 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: editorial to incorporate exception into main SC text for 1.4.13 (Saturday, 6 January)
• Re: Response to Issue 659/660/386 (Friday, 5 January)
• Re: Response to Issue 659/660/386 (Friday, 5 January)
• Re: Response to Issue 659/660/386 (Thursday, 4 January)
• Re: Agenda for Tuesday January 2, 2018 call (Tuesday, 2 January)

Janina Sajka

• Re: making the draft for CR accurate (Saturday, 27 January)
• Re: Trying to be clear - was making the draft for CR accurate (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: making the draft for CR accurate (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: publishing updates to the gap analysis/ road map and user research module (Friday, 5 January)

Jeanne Spellman

• Silver Progress Update for 4th Quarter 2017 to present (Monday, 12 February)

Jim Allan

• Minutes: Face to Face 20 March 2018 (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Minutes: Face to Face 19 March 2018 (Tuesday, 20 March)
• Re: CFC - response to issue 757, Units used by Reflow SC (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Heading update on QuiickRef (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: CFC - Issue 761 (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: CFC - Response to Issue 759 (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: CFC - response to issue 760 (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: CFC - Response to 756 (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: CFC - Permission to publish draft of rules format and updated demo rules site. (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: CFC - response to issue 758 (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: List Headings in Navigation Panels (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: CFC - Resolving issues 733, 744, 745, 746, 747 (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: "auto" response to new issues in Github (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis (Thursday, 1 February)
• Minutes: AG WG Teleconference Tuesday 29 January (Tuesday, 30 January)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issue 634 and 663 on Pointer Gestures (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 697 (The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions) (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 674 (1st Note in SC 1.4.10 Reflow) and Reflow edits (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 649, 616, 411, 282, 680, and 686 on Graphics Contrast (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issue 650/655/695/711 on Content on Hover or Focus (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: Content on Hover or Focus (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: CFC - Responses to issues 657, 677, and 685 on text spacing (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 598: Exit criteria technology-specific? (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Responses to issues 657, 677, and 685 on text spacing (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 667: SC 2.2.8 Timeouts - Proposal for change of wording (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 670 "SC 2.4.12 Label in Name - Proposal for change of wording" (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to Issue 589 (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 656 and 644 (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to Issues 296 and 315 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: CFC - Description for Guideline 6.2 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Definition for Issues 671 and 261 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to Issue 520 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: CFC - response to Issue 605 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: CFC - Adding identifiers to Common Purpose lists (Wednesday, 3 January)
• Re: CFC - Issue 619 response (Wednesday, 3 January)
• Re: CFC - Issue 630 response (Wednesday, 3 January)
• Re: CFC - Issue 150 response (Wednesday, 3 January)

John Foliot

• Re: 1.3.5 from Mark (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: What's the address where we meet tomorrow in San Diego? (Monday, 19 March)
• Renaming the Guideline it falls under. (was Re: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is) (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: CFC - response to issue 757, Units used by Reflow SC (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Heading update on QuiickRef (Friday, 9 March)
• Re: Security of Autocomplete - Good News! (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Agenda for Thursday March 1 teleconference - 12pm ET (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - Understanding doc update (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - Understanding doc update (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: Security of Autocomplete - Good News! (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Security of Autocomplete - Good News! (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - to keep or not? (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: Any user testing of WCAG 2.1 at CSUN (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: CFC - Permission to publish draft of rules format and updated demo rules site. (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: CFC - response to issue 760 (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: CFC - Issue 761 (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: CFC - response to issue 758 (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: CFC - Response to 756 (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: CFC - Response to Issue 759 (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: Unsupported Autofill values and Common Purpose (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: Unsupported Autofill values and Common Purpose (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: Unsupported Autofill values and Common Purpose (Monday, 19 February)
• Researching @autocomplete for SC 1.3.4 (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: Question on techniques for Identify Common Purpose (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: Question on techniques for Identify Common Purpose (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: Question on techniques for Identify Common Purpose (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: Question on techniques for Identify Common Purpose (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: Question on techniques for Identify Common Purpose (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: CFC - Resolving issues 733, 744, 745, 746, 747 (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: Even for Note-track? Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: Even for Note-track? Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: Agenda Thursday AG WG call - 12:00pm (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? (Wednesday, 31 January)
• Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: Trying to be clear - was making the draft for CR accurate (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: approving the draft for WCAG 2.1 (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: notes on 320 CSS Pixels to inches (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Identify Common Controls, Identify Controls, and Issue responses (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: Animation from Interactions - ease-in-out (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 649, 616, 411, 282, 680, and 686 on Graphics Contrast (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Responses to issues 657, 677, and 685 on text spacing (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 674 (1st Note in SC 1.4.10 Reflow) and Reflow edits (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Target Size (2 options) (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issue 634 and 663 on Pointer Gestures (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: Agenda for Thursday January 18 call (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 697 (The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions) (Thursday, 18 January)
• On The Side: (was Re: CFC - Updated Response to issue 650/655/695/711 on Content on Hover or Focus) (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issue 650/655/695/711 on Content on Hover or Focus (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: notes on 320 CSS Pixels to inches (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Wednesday, 17 January)
• RE: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to Issue 589 (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 667: SC 2.2.8 Timeouts - Proposal for change of wording (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 670 "SC 2.4.12 Label in Name - Proposal for change of wording" (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: Move 3.2.6 Status changes to the Adaptable guideline? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Need Clarification on #170 (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: Addressing issue 667 / Timeouts (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: New Thread: Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Definition for Issues 671 and 261 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to Issues 296 and 315 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: CFC - Description for Guideline 6.2 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• New Thread: Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: Need Clarification on #170 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: Extra meeting on Wednesday 11am-1pm ET (Monday, 8 January)
• Re: WCAG-ACTION-341: Write a new definition for "new" for https://www.w3.org/tr/wcag21/#commonpurposes (Friday, 5 January)
• Re: WCAG-ACTION-341: Write a new definition for "new" for https://www.w3.org/tr/wcag21/#commonpurposes (Friday, 5 January)
• Re: CFC - Issue 150 response (Thursday, 4 January)
• Re: CFC - Issue 630 response (Wednesday, 3 January)
• Re: Identifiers (Wednesday, 3 January)
• Re: CFC - Adding identifiers to Common Purpose lists (Wednesday, 3 January)
• Re: CFC - Issue 619 response (Wednesday, 3 January)
• Today's call - agenda addition request (Tuesday, 2 January)

Jonathan Avila

• RE: Renaming the Guideline it falls under. (was Re: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is) (Thursday, 15 March)
• RE: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is (Thursday, 15 March)
• RE: Is wikipedia really an example of a fail for 2.4.12? (Tuesday, 6 March)
• RE: Is wikipedia really an example of a fail for 2.4.12? (Monday, 5 March)
• RE: SC 1.3.4 - Understanding doc update (Thursday, 1 March)
• RE: SC 1.3.4 - Understanding doc update (Wednesday, 28 February)
• RE: Any user testing of WCAG 2.1 at CSUN (Monday, 26 February)
• RE: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC (Monday, 26 February)
• RE: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC (Wednesday, 21 February)
• RE: Question on techniques for Identify Common Purpose (Thursday, 15 February)
• RE: Question on techniques for Identify Common Purpose (Wednesday, 14 February)
• RE: Question on techniques for Identify Common Purpose (Tuesday, 13 February)
• RE: Question on techniques for Identify Common Purpose (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: making the draft for CR accurate (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: notes on 320 CSS Pixels to inches (Thursday, 18 January)
• RE: CFC - Response to issue 697 (The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions) (Thursday, 18 January)
• RE: CFC - Target Size (2 options) (Thursday, 18 January)
• RE: CFC - Response to issue 674 (1st Note in SC 1.4.10 Reflow) and Reflow edits (Thursday, 18 January)
• RE: CFC - Response to issue 211: Learning Disabilities of America - Technology Committee Comments: WCAG 2.1 For Learning Disabilities and Cognitive Disabilities (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: Pointer SC questions (Monday, 15 January)
• RE: CFC - Description for Guideline 6.2 (Sunday, 14 January)
• RE: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 (Sunday, 14 January)
• RE: Re[2]: Move 3.2.6 Status changes to the Adaptable guideline? (Sunday, 14 January)
• RE: Response to Issue 659/660/386 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Tuesday, 9 January)

Joshue O Connor

• Re: SC 1.3.4 - to keep or not? (Saturday, 24 February)
• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? (Wednesday, 31 January)
• RE: AGENDA AG WG Teleconference Tuesday 29 January (Monday, 29 January)
• RE: CFC - Target Size (2 options) (Saturday, 20 January)
• Re: Re[2]: Proposal for: Animation from Interactions (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Sunday, 7 January)
• RE: AGENDA for AGWG call Thursday, January 4, 2018 (Thursday, 4 January)

Joshue O Connor - InterAccess

• Re: 1.3.5 from Mark (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: AGWG agenda Thurs 29th March 2018 (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: another test page for 1.3.5 (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: another test page for 1.3.5 (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: another test page for 1.3.5 (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: another test page for 1.3.5 (Thursday, 29 March)
• AGWG agenda Thurs 29th March 2018 (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Agenda - 27th March 2018 (Monday, 26 March)
• Re: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: CFC - Move 3.2.6 to 4.1 (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: Agenda Thursday WCAG call March 8, 2018 @ 12PM ET (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Is wikipedia really an example of a fail for 2.4.12? (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Is wikipedia really an example of a fail for 2.4.12? (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: Any user testing of WCAG 2.1 at CSUN (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: Unsupported Autofill values and Common Purpose (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: Understanding merged and branches updated (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: coga techniques and have tracked implementations and understading (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: coga techniques and have tracked implementations and understading (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: Question on techniques for Identify Common Purpose (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Question on techniques for Identify Common Purpose (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: AGENDA for AGWG teleconference, Tuesday Feb 6 (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Some resources for writing WCAG techniques (Tuesday, 30 January)
• Re: Ability to revisit/edit things from previous versions (was Re: Trying to be clear - was making the draft for CR accurate) (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: Ability to revisit/edit things from previous versions (was Re: Trying to be clear - was making the draft for CR accurate) (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: Trying to be clear - was making the draft for CR accurate (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: AGENDA - AGWG call Tuesday, January 23rd (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Re[2]: Keeping Target Size (Enhanced)? Even with 22px? (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Re: CFC - Target Size (2 options) (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: Here's where we are at 3pm Wednesday (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Here's where we are at 3pm Wednesday (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: side conversation on 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: side conversation on 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Target size proposal (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Target size proposal (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: side conversation on 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re[4]: Proposal for: Animation from Interactions (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re[2]: Target size proposal (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re[2]: Proposal for: Animation from Interactions (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re[2]: viewport/browser window size does not imply presence/lack of touch input... (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re[4]: What can I do, you may ask? (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re[2]: Finding agreement on common purpose (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re[2]: Finding agreement on common purpose (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re[2]: Finding agreement on common purpose (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re[2]: Response to issue 697 on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re[2]: What can I do, you may ask? (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re[2]: CFC - Response to issue 211: Learning Disabilities of America - Technology Committee Comments: WCAG 2.1 For Learning Disabilities and Cognitive Disabilities (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CSUN F2F (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CSUN F2F (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CSUN F2F (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Objection Re: CFC - Response to Issue 520 (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re[2]: Move 3.2.6 Status changes to the Adaptable guideline? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: New Thread: Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: Guideline 2.6 text (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: Issue 520 (Tuesday, 9 January)

Kathy Wahlbin

• RE: Agenda: Tuesday March 6, 2018 Teleconference (Tuesday, 6 March)
• RE: CFC - Permission to publish draft of rules format and updated demo rules site. (Tuesday, 20 February)
• RE: CFC - Resolving issues 733, 744, 745, 746, 747 (Wednesday, 7 February)
• RE: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 (Thursday, 11 January)
• RE: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 (Thursday, 11 January)
• RE: AGENDA for AGWG call Thursday, January 4, 2018 (Thursday, 4 January)

Katie Haritos-Shea

• Re: Agenda - 27th March 2018 (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: Renaming the Guideline it falls under. (was Re: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is) (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: Placement of 1.3.4 (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: CFC - Move 3.2.6 to 4.1 (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: CFC - response to issue 757, Units used by Reflow SC (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Heading update on QuiickRef (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Placement of 1.3.4 (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Agenda Thursday WCAG call March 8, 2018 @ 12PM ET (Thursday, 8 March)
• Re: Question about individual SC implementation evaluations (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Is wikipedia really an example of a fail for 2.4.12? (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Cal for today? Agenda for (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - Understanding doc update (Thursday, 1 March)
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - Understanding doc update (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - Understanding doc update (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - Understanding doc update (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - Understanding doc update (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - to keep or not? (Saturday, 24 February)
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - to keep or not? (Saturday, 24 February)
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - to keep or not? (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - to keep or not? (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - to keep or not? (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - to keep or not? (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - to keep or not? (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: CFC - response to issue 760 (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: CFC - Permission to publish draft of rules format and updated demo rules site. (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: Unsupported Autofill values and Common Purpose (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: We have a location for the face to face (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: CFC - Resolving issues 733, 744, 745, 746, 747 (Tuesday, 6 February)
• RE: "auto" response to new issues in Github (Friday, 2 February)
• RE: Agenda Thursday AG WG call - 12:00pm (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? (Wednesday, 31 January)
• Re: Volunteers for initial proposals to edit Abstract/introduction (Tuesday, 30 January)
• Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: Anyone else having trouble logging in to answer the WCAG 2.1 CR survey (Thursday, 25 January)
• Anyone else having trouble logging in to answer the WCAG 2.1 CR survey (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: approving the draft for WCAG 2.1 (Wednesday, 24 January)
• Re: CFC - Target Size (2 options) (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Target Size (2 options) (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Target size proposal (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: What can I do, you may ask? (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• RE: Guideline 2.6 text (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: Guideline 2.6 text (Wednesday, 10 January)
• RE: editorial to incorporate exception into main SC text for 1.4.13 (Sunday, 7 January)

Kim Patch

• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts (Friday, 19 January)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts (Friday, 19 January)

kimberlee.dirks@thomsonreuters.com

• RE: AGWG agenda Thurs 29th March 2018 (Thursday, 29 March)
• RE: Agenda Thursday WCAG call March 8, 2018 @ 12PM ET (Thursday, 8 March)
• RE: Agenda for Tuesday Feb 27 teleconference (Tuesday, 27 February)
• RE: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC (Thursday, 22 February)
• RE: AGENDA for AGWG teleconference, Tuesday Feb 6 (Tuesday, 6 February)
• RE: editorial to incorporate exception into main SC text for 1.4.13 (Monday, 8 January)
• RE: Extra meeting on Wednesday 11am-1pm ET (Monday, 8 January)
• RE: CFC - Adding identifiers to Common Purpose lists (Thursday, 4 January)
• RE: CFC - Issue 150 response (Thursday, 4 January)
• RE: CFC - Issue 619 response (Thursday, 4 January)
• RE: CFC - Issue 630 response (Thursday, 4 January)

Ku, Jaeun

• [Extended deadline] Survey for WCAG and Game Accessibility Guidelines Gap Analysis (Wednesday, 21 March)
• [reminder] Survey for WCAG and Game Accessibility Guidelines Gap Analysis (Saturday, 17 March)
• Survey for WCAG and Game Accessibility Guidelines Gap Analysis (Friday, 9 March)

Laura Carlson

• Re: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: CFC - Move 3.2.6 to 4.1 (Monday, 19 March)
• Re: CFC - response to issue 757, Units used by Reflow SC (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: CFC - response to issue 760 (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: CFC - Issue 761 (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: CFC - response to issue 758 (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: CFC - Response to 756 (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: CFC - Response to Issue 759 (Tuesday, 20 February)
• WCAG WG Meeting Minutes February 20, 2018 (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: MINUTES Tuesday February 13, 2018 (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Proposed response to issue 759 (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: CFC - Resolving issues 733, 744, 745, 746, 747 (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: "auto" response to new issues in Github (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: Agenda Thursday AG WG call - 12:00pm (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? (Wednesday, 31 January)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issue 650/655/695/711 on Content on Hover or Focus (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 674 (1st Note in SC 1.4.10 Reflow) and Reflow edits (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 649, 616, 411, 282, 680, and 686 on Graphics Contrast (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 697 (The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions) (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Responses to issues 657, 677, and 685 on text spacing (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Proposal for: Animation from Interactions (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: CFC - Responses to issues 657, 677, and 685 on text spacing (Tuesday, 16 January)
• RE: CFC - Responses to issues 657, 677, and 685 on text spacing (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to Issue 589 (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: Issue 520 (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 656 and 644 (Tuesday, 9 January)
• Re: AGENDA for AGWG call Thursday, January 4, 2018 (Thursday, 4 January)
• Re: CFC - Issue 150 response (Wednesday, 3 January)
• Re: Agenda for Tuesday January 2, 2018 call (Tuesday, 2 January)

lisa.seeman

• 1.3.5 from Mark (Thursday, 29 March)
• another test page for 1.3.5 (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Security of Autocomplete - Good News! (Wednesday, 7 March)
• SC 1.3.4 - to keep or not? (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: coga techniques and have tracked implementations and understading (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: Use of ARIA to satisfy 'Identify common purpose' SC (Tuesday, 20 February)
• edit to understanding sections for purpose of controls and common purpose (Tuesday, 20 February)
• implementations and techniques for 1.3.4 and 1.3.5 (Monday, 19 February)
• coga techniques and have tracked implementations and understading (Thursday, 15 February)
• Working Draft for personalization-semantics-content (Thursday, 8 February)
• RE: Re:RE: AGENDA for AGWG teleconference, Tuesday Feb 6 (Thursday, 8 February)
• objections RE: CFC - Resolving issues 733, 744, 745, 746, 747 (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re:RE: AGENDA for AGWG teleconference, Tuesday Feb 6 (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: Even for Note-track? Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation (Monday, 29 January)
• RE: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation (Sunday, 28 January)
• OBJECTION Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation (Sunday, 28 January)
• Re: making the draft for CR accurate (Friday, 26 January)
• Trying to be clear - was making the draft for CR accurate (Friday, 26 January)
• making the draft for CR accurate (Thursday, 25 January)
• RE: AGENDA - AGWG call Tuesday, January 23rd (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Re: CFC - Identify Common Controls, Identify Controls, and Issue responses (Friday, 19 January)
• Re: CFC - Identify Common Controls, Identify Controls, and Issue responses (Friday, 19 January)
• Re: CFC - Identify Common Controls, Identify Controls, and Issue responses (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: Agenda for Tuesday January 16 meeting (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: Dealy in "Common Purposes" (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: Issue 719 (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: Issue 719 (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: Dealy in "Common Purposes" (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: Dealy in "Common Purposes" (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Description for Guideline 6.2 (Monday, 15 January)
• Common purpose - another AT (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: Dealy in "Common Purposes" (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 211: Learning Disabilities of America - Technology Committee Comments: WCAG 2.1 For Learning Disabilities and Cognitive Disabilities (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 667: SC 2.2.8 Timeouts - Proposal for change of wording (Monday, 15 January)
• Fwd: Dealy in "Common Purposes" (Sunday, 14 January)
• Re: Objection Re: CFC - Response to Issue 520 (Sunday, 14 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to Issue 589 (Sunday, 14 January)
• Re: CFC - Description for Guideline 6.2 (Sunday, 14 January)
• Re: Objection Re: CFC - Response to Issue 520 (Sunday, 14 January)
• Issue 719 - more important feedback in in favor (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics (Friday, 12 January)
• Common purpose. Feedback from EasyReading (Friday, 12 January)
• general problem with CFCs (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Friday, 12 January)
• RE: CFC - Response to Issues 296 and 315 (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: CFC - Description for Guideline 6.2 (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 656 and 644 (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: CFC - response to Issue 605 (Friday, 12 January)
• Objection Re: CFC - Response to Issue 520 (Friday, 12 January)
• proposed responses to the purpose of controls issues (Thursday, 11 January)
• Another implementation (Thursday, 11 January)
• Fwd: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics (Thursday, 11 January)
• implementations for purpose of controls (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: Agenda AGWG meeting, Tuesday January 9, 2018 (Monday, 8 January)
• regrets (Monday, 8 January)
• Re: publishing updates to the gap analysis/ road map and user research module (Thursday, 4 January)

Léonie Watson

• Re: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: Timeline to get WCAG 2.1 to Rec (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Timeline to get WCAG 2.1 to Rec (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Even for Note-track? Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: Even for Note-track? Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: Even for Note-track? Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation (Monday, 29 January)
• Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: Ability to revisit/edit things from previous versions (was Re: Trying to be clear - was making the draft for CR accurate) (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 697 (The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions) (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Target Size (2 options) (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Proposal for: Animation from Interactions (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 697: The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: What can I do, you may ask? (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)

Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc.

• Re: Agenda Thursday WCAG call March 13, 2018 @ 11PM ET (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Agenda: Tuesday March 6, 2018 Teleconference (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Agenda Thursday February 15 conference (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: UPDATED Agenda Tuesday February 13, 2018 (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: CFC - Resolving issues 733, 744, 745, 746, 747 (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: Agenda Thursday AG WG call - 12:00pm (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: Volunteers for initial proposals to edit Abstract/introduction (Tuesday, 30 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 674 (1st Note in SC 1.4.10 Reflow) and Reflow edits (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Responses to issues 620, 621, and 676 on user motion (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 697: The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: CFC - Responses to issues 657, 677, and 685 on text spacing (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 670 "SC 2.4.12 Label in Name - Proposal for change of wording" (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 667: SC 2.2.8 Timeouts - Proposal for change of wording (Monday, 15 January)
• Public comments in Japanese (Sunday, 14 January)
• Re: Need Clarification on #170 (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Agenda for Thursday January 11, 2018 call (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: CFC - Description for Guideline 6.2 (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 656 and 644 (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Definition for Issues 671 and 261 (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: Need Clarification on #170 (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: Need Clarification on #170 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: Need Clarification on #170 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Need Clarification on #170 (Tuesday, 9 January)

Marc Johlic

• Re: another test page for 1.3.5 (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: CFC - Move 3.2.6 to 4.1 (Sunday, 18 March)
• Re: What's the address where we meet tomorrow in San Diego? (Sunday, 18 March)
• Re: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: CFC - Permission to publish draft of rules format and updated demo rules site. (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: CFC - Response to 756 (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: CFC - Response to Issue 759 (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: CFC - Issue 761 (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: Agenda Thursday AG WG call - 12:00pm (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: AGENDA AG WG Teleconference Tuesday 29 January (Tuesday, 30 January)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts (Friday, 19 January)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 649, 616, 411, 282, 680, and 686 on Graphics Contrast (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Target Size (2 options) (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 697 (The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions) (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 674 (1st Note in SC 1.4.10 Reflow) and Reflow edits (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issue 650/655/695/711 on Content on Hover or Focus (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issue 634 and 663 on Pointer Gestures (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Responses to issues 657, 677, and 685 on text spacing (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Responses to issues 620, 621, and 676 on user motion (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 697: The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 211: Learning Disabilities of America - Technology Committee Comments: WCAG 2.1 For Learning Disabilities and Cognitive Disabilities (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to Issue 589 (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 670 "SC 2.4.12 Label in Name - Proposal for change of wording" (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 667: SC 2.2.8 Timeouts - Proposal for change of wording (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 (Thursday, 11 January)

Melanie Philipp

• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Tuesday, 9 January)

Michael Cooper

• False alarm Re: Understanding survey Change of Content -> Status Changes (Friday, 30 March)
• Understanding survey Change of Content -> Status Changes (Thursday, 29 March)
• Re: Timeline to get WCAG 2.1 to Rec (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Timeline to get WCAG 2.1 to Rec (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Fwd: Daylight Saving Time change –first half of 2018 (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: coga techniques and have tracked implementations and understading (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Understanding merged and branches updated (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: Even for Note-track? Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: Even for Note-track? Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis (Friday, 2 February)
• Even for Note-track? Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: Updating understanding docs (Wednesday, 24 January)
• Re: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics (Friday, 12 January)
• Telecon info Re: Extra meeting on Wednesday 11am-1pm ET (Tuesday, 9 January)

Michael Gower

• Re: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: CFC - response to issue 757, Units used by Reflow SC (Thursday, 15 March)
• MINUTES Tuesday WCAG call March 13, 2018 (Tuesday, 13 March)
• RE: Is wikipedia really an example of a fail for 2.4.12? (Tuesday, 6 March)
• RE: SC 1.3.4 Another consideration? (Thursday, 1 March)
• SC 1.3.4 Another consideration? (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - Understanding doc update (Wednesday, 28 February)
• 2.2.6 Timeouts versus 2.2.1 Timing Adjustable (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: SC 1.3.4 - to keep or not? (Monday, 26 February)
• MINUTES Tuesday February 13, 2018 (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: AGENDA AG WG Teleconference Tuesday 29 January (Tuesday, 30 January)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issue 650/655/695/711 on Content on Hover or Focus (Friday, 19 January)
• Re: CFC - Identify Common Controls, Identify Controls, and Issue responses (Friday, 19 January)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts (Friday, 19 January)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 649, 616, 411, 282, 680, and 686 on Graphics Contrast (Friday, 19 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 697 (The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions) (Friday, 19 January)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issues 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts (Friday, 19 January)
• Re: Discussiong for Updated Response to issue 650/655/695/711 on Content on Hover or Focus (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issue 650/655/695/711 on Content on Hover or Focus (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Updated Response to issue 634 and 663 on Pointer Gestures (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: side conversation on 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: side conversation on 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: side conversation on 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issues 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Created branch with proposed wording for 1.3.4 (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Created branch with proposed wording for 1.3.4 (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Wednesday, 17 January)
• MINUTES for Tuesday January 16 meeting (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issues 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts (Monday, 15 January)
• RE: Re[2]: Move 3.2.6 Status changes to the Adaptable guideline? (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Re[2]: Move 3.2.6 Status changes to the Adaptable guideline? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Move 3.2.6 Status changes to the Adaptable guideline? (Friday, 12 January)
• Re: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• RE: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• RE: Guideline 2.6 text (Thursday, 11 January)
• MINUTES for AGWG meeting Thursday, December 14 2017 (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Definition for Issues 671 and 261 (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: CFC - Description for Guideline 6.2 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• MINUTES for Extra WCAG call Wednesday January 10, 2018 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: Agenda for Extra WCAG call Wednesday January 10, 2018 (Wednesday, 10 January)

Michael Pluke

• RE: AGENDA AG WG Teleconference Tuesday 29 January (Monday, 29 January)
• RE: CFC - Response to issue 656 and 644 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• RE: editorial to incorporate exception into main SC text for 1.4.13 (Saturday, 6 January)
• RE: AGENDA for AGWG call Thursday, January 4, 2018 (Wednesday, 3 January)

Mike Elledge

• Re: RE: Agenda Thursday WCAG call March 13, 2018 @ 11PM ET (Tuesday, 13 March)
• Re: Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: Agenda for Tuesday Feb 20 teleconference (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: List Headings in Navigation Panels (Thursday, 8 February)
• List Headings in Navigation Panels (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: RE: AGENDA - AGWG call Tuesday, January 23rd (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Re: Agenda for Tuesday January 16 meeting (Tuesday, 16 January)

Patrick H. Lauke

• Re: CFC - Decision to keep 1.3.4 where it is (Friday, 16 March)
• Re: CFC - response to issue 757, Units used by Reflow SC (Wednesday, 14 March)
• Re: Finding examples which demonstrate "Concurrent Input Mechanisms" (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: Finding examples which demonstrate "Concurrent Input Mechanisms" (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: Even for Note-track? Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: Ability to revisit/edit things from previous versions (was Re: Trying to be clear - was making the draft for CR accurate) (Friday, 26 January)
• Ability to revisit/edit things from previous versions (was Re: Trying to be clear - was making the draft for CR accurate) (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: Trying to be clear - was making the draft for CR accurate (Friday, 26 January)
• Re: Keeping Target Size (Enhanced)? Even with 22px? (Sunday, 21 January)
• Re: CFC - Target Size (2 options) (Saturday, 20 January)
• Re: CFC - Target Size (2 options) (Saturday, 20 January)
• Re: notes on 320 CSS Pixels to inches (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Target Size (2 options) (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 697 (The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions) (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: notes on 320 CSS Pixels to inches (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: CFC - Target Size (2 options) (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: notes on 320 CSS Pixels to inches (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: Proposal for: Animation from Interactions (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: Target size proposal (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Target size proposal (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Target size proposal (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: viewport/browser window size does not imply presence/lack of touch input... (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Target size proposal (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Draft Response for #721 (RNIB): Seven issues remain where I need your help... (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Target size proposal (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Target size proposal (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: Target size proposal (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: viewport/browser window size does not imply presence/lack of touch input... (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: Proposal for: Animation from Interactions (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: viewport/browser window size does not imply presence/lack of touch input... (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: viewport/browser window size does not imply presence/lack of touch input... (Tuesday, 16 January)
• viewport/browser window size does not imply presence/lack of touch input... (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: Finding agreement on common purpose (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: Response to issue 697 on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 697: The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: CFC - Response to issue 697: The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• Re: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Sunday, 7 January)
• Re: Accessible Authentication and issue responses (Tuesday, 2 January)
• Re: Accessible Authentication and issue responses (Tuesday, 2 January)
• Re: Accessible Authentication and issue responses (Tuesday, 2 January)

Philippe Le Hégaret

• Re: Anyone else having trouble logging in to answer the WCAG 2.1 CR survey (Thursday, 25 January)

Pietro Cirrincione

• Re: Agenda for Tuesday Feb 20 teleconference (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: UPDATED Agenda Tuesday February 13, 2018 (Tuesday, 13 February)
• RE: AGENDA for AGWG teleconference, Tuesday Feb 6 (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: AGENDA AG WG Teleconference Tuesday 29 January (Tuesday, 30 January)
• Re: AGENDA - AGWG call Tuesday, January 23rd (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Re: Agenda for Tuesday January 16 meeting (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: Agenda for Tuesday January 2, 2018 call (Monday, 1 January)

Repsher, Stephen J

• RE: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation (Tuesday, 23 January)
• RE: Keeping Target Size (Enhanced)? Even with 22px? (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Keeping Target Size (Enhanced)? Even with 22px? (Sunday, 21 January)
• RE: CFC - Target Size (2 options) (Friday, 19 January)
• RE: Discussiong for Updated Response to issue 650/655/695/711 on Content on Hover or Focus (Thursday, 18 January)
• Discussiong for Updated Response to issue 650/655/695/711 on Content on Hover or Focus (Thursday, 18 January)
• RE: CFC - Updated Response to issues 649, 616, 411, 282, 680, and 686 on Graphics Contrast (Thursday, 18 January)
• RE: CFC - Target Size (2 options) (Thursday, 18 January)
• RE: CFC - Updated Response to issues 649, 616, 411, 282, 680, and 686 on Graphics Contrast (Thursday, 18 January)
• RE: CFC - Updated Response to issue 634 and 663 on Pointer Gestures (Thursday, 18 January)
• RE: CFC - Updated Response to issue 650/655/695/711 on Content on Hover or Focus (Thursday, 18 January)
• RE: Content on Hover or Focus (Wednesday, 17 January)
• RE: Content on Hover or Focus (Wednesday, 17 January)
• RE: Proposal for: Animation from Interactions (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Content on Hover or Focus (Wednesday, 17 January)
• RE: Proposal for: Animation from Interactions (Wednesday, 17 January)
• RE: pointer Gestures (Tuesday, 16 January)
• RE: CFC - Response to issue 634 and 663 on Pointer Gestures (Tuesday, 16 January)
• RE: Pointer SC questions (Monday, 15 January)
• RE: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• RE: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• RE: New Thread: Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 (Thursday, 11 January)
• RE: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 (Wednesday, 10 January)
• RE: Guideline 2.6 text (Wednesday, 10 January)
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Tuesday, 9 January)
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Tuesday, 9 January)
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Tuesday, 9 January)
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Tuesday, 9 January)
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Tuesday, 9 January)
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Tuesday, 9 January)
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Tuesday, 9 January)

Rochford, John

• RE: CFC - Accessible Authentication and issue responses (-1, objection) (Wednesday, 3 January)

Schnabel, Stefan

• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? (Wednesday, 31 January)

Shadi Abou-Zahra

• [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 15 March 2018 (Thursday, 15 March)
• Call for Review: ACT Rules Format 1.0 Working Draft (Thursday, 8 March)
• [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 1 March 2018 (Thursday, 1 March)
• [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 22 February 2018 (Friday, 23 February)
• [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 15 February 2018 (Thursday, 15 February)
• [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 8 February 2018 (Thursday, 15 February)
• Fwd: [Online Symposium] ACT Rules for Manual Web Accessibility Evaluation Methodologies on 14 March 2018 (Thursday, 15 February)
• [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 1 February 2018 (Friday, 2 February)
• [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 25 January 2018 (Thursday, 25 January)
• [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 18 January 2018 (Thursday, 18 January)
• [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 11 January 2018 (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 (Thursday, 11 January)
• [Minutes] WCAG Accessibility Conformance Testing (ACT) Task Force - Meeting on 4 January 2018 (Thursday, 4 January)

Steve Faulkner

• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? (Wednesday, 31 January)

Thomas Westin

• Re: Survey for WCAG and Game Accessibility Guidelines Gap Analysis (Friday, 9 March)

Wayne Dick

• Re: WCAG needs to do this - Any user testing of WCAG 2.1 at CSUN (Saturday, 3 March)
• Re: WCAG needs to do this - Any user testing of WCAG 2.1 at CSUN (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: Could we add "Persona Quotes" as a standard part of the Understanding Documents for WCAG 2.1? (Friday, 2 February)

White, Jason J

• RE: Survey for WCAG and Game Accessibility Guidelines Gap Analysis (Friday, 9 March)
• RE: Placement of 1.3.4 (Friday, 9 March)
• RE: SC 1.3.4 - Understanding doc update (Wednesday, 28 February)
• RE: Alastair Campbell appointed co-chair of AG WG (Tuesday, 27 February)
• RE: SC 1.3.4 - to keep or not? (Wednesday, 21 February)
• RE: Question on techniques for Identify Common Purpose (Thursday, 15 February)
• RE: Question on techniques for Identify Common Purpose (Thursday, 15 February)
• RE: Question on techniques for Identify Common Purpose (Wednesday, 14 February)
• RE: MINUTES Tuesday February 13, 2018 (Tuesday, 13 February)
• RE: Question on techniques for Identify Common Purpose (Tuesday, 13 February)
• RE: Question on techniques for Identify Common Purpose (Tuesday, 13 February)
• RE: Question on techniques for Identify Common Purpose (Tuesday, 13 February)
• RE: List Headings in Navigation Panels (Thursday, 8 February)
• RE: CFC - Resolving issues 733, 744, 745, 746, 747 (Tuesday, 6 February)
• RE: Even for Note-track? Re: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis (Friday, 2 February)
• RE: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation (Sunday, 28 January)
• RE: Ability to revisit/edit things from previous versions (was Re: Trying to be clear - was making the draft for CR accurate) (Friday, 26 January)
• RE: CFC - Transition UPDATED WCAG 2.1 Editor's Draft to Candidate Recommendation (Tuesday, 23 January)
• RE: CFC - Response to issue 697 (The Paciello Group comment on 2.2.9 Animation from Interactions) (Saturday, 20 January)
• RE: CFC - Updated Response to issues 649, 616, 411, 282, 680, and 686 on Graphics Contrast (Saturday, 20 January)
• RE: CFC - Response to issue 674 (1st Note in SC 1.4.10 Reflow) and Reflow edits (Saturday, 20 January)
• RE: CFC - Target Size (2 options) (Saturday, 20 January)
• RE: 1.3.4, autocomplete and esignatures (Friday, 19 January)
• RE: CFC - Updated Response to issues 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts (Friday, 19 January)
• RE: CFC - Target Size (2 options) (Thursday, 18 January)
• RE: Created branch with proposed wording for 1.3.4 (Wednesday, 17 January)
• RE: Created branch with proposed wording for 1.3.4 (Wednesday, 17 January)
• RE: Finding agreement on common purpose (Monday, 15 January)
• RE: CFC - Responses to issues 657, 677, and 685 on text spacing (Monday, 15 January)
• RE: CFC - Response to issues 386, 659, and 660, 669, and 688 on Character Key Shortcuts (Monday, 15 January)
• RE: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• RE: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• RE: Objection Re: CFC - Response to Issue 520 (Friday, 12 January)
• RE: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• RE: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• RE: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• RE: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• RE: Possible wording for 1.3.4? (Friday, 12 January)
• RE: a suggestion for Personalization Semantics (Friday, 12 January)
• RE: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 (Thursday, 11 January)
• RE: CFC - Changes to Target Size for Issue 631 (Thursday, 11 January)
• RE: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Wednesday, 10 January)
• RE: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Wednesday, 10 January)
• RE: Identify Common Purpose - resolving issues (Wednesday, 10 January)
• RE: Guideline 2.6 text (Wednesday, 10 January)
• RE: Guideline 2.6 text (Wednesday, 10 January)
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Wednesday, 10 January)
• RE: Issue 520 (Tuesday, 9 January)
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Tuesday, 9 January)
• RE: Issue 650 Does the Hover or focus SC apply to tabbed interfaces? (Tuesday, 9 January)
• RE: UPDATED Agenda AGWG meeting, Tuesday January 9, 2018 (Monday, 8 January)
• RE: UPDATED Agenda AGWG meeting, Tuesday January 9, 2018 (Monday, 8 January)
• RE: editorial to incorporate exception into main SC text for 1.4.13 (Saturday, 6 January)
• RE: editorial to incorporate exception into main SC text for 1.4.13 (Saturday, 6 January)
• RE: editorial to incorporate exception into main SC text for 1.4.13 (Saturday, 6 January)
• RE: WCAG-ACTION-341: Write a new definition for "new" for https://www.w3.org/tr/wcag21/#commonpurposes (Friday, 5 January)
• RE: WCAG-ACTION-341: Write a new definition for "new" for https://www.w3.org/tr/wcag21/#commonpurposes (Friday, 5 January)
• RE: CFC - Issue 619 response (Thursday, 4 January)
• RE: CFC - Issue 630 response (Wednesday, 3 January)
• RE: CFC - Issue 150 response (Wednesday, 3 January)
• RE: CFC - Adding identifiers to Common Purpose lists (Wednesday, 3 January)
• RE: Accessible Authentication and issue responses (Wednesday, 3 January)
• RE: CFC - Accessible Authentication and issue responses (Tuesday, 2 January)

Wilcock, Mark

• RE: CFC - response to issue 757, Units used by Reflow SC (Thursday, 15 March)
• RE: CFC - response to issue 758 (Wednesday, 21 February)
• RE: CFC - Response to 756 (Wednesday, 21 February)
• RE: CFC - response to issue 760 (Wednesday, 21 February)
• RE: CFC - Resolving issues 733, 744, 745, 746, 747 (Wednesday, 7 February)
• RE: CFC - Standing permission to publish Working Drafts of COGA Gap Analysis (Friday, 2 February)
• RE: Agenda for Thursday January 18 call (Thursday, 18 January)
• RE: Agenda for Thursday January 11, 2018 call (Thursday, 11 January)
• RE: CFC - Response to Issues 296 and 315 (Thursday, 11 January)
• RE: UPDATED Agenda AGWG meeting, Tuesday January 9, 2018 (Tuesday, 9 January)
• RE: Agenda for Tuesday January 2, 2018 call (Tuesday, 2 January)

Xueyuan

• Call for Exclusions: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 (Tuesday, 30 January)

Last message date: Friday, 30 March 2018 18:54:25 UTC