W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: Review comments on PDF4

From: Mary Utt <maryutt@paciellogroup.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 11:39:46 -0400
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=iYwwpa0NsCQ1+ZcK0EYcD4dY_Jw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Loretta Guarino Reid
<lorettaguarino@google.com> wrote:
> "Assistive Technology" -> "assistive technology"

Done.

> I suggest changing the text of the link  working example of marking a
> background image as an artifact (Word file)" to " working example of
> creating a decorative image  (Word file)", since the current text makes me
> think that there is a way to mark the image as an artifact from Word.

Done.

> Change the test procedure: "For each image that is purely decorative" ->
> "For an image that is purely decorative"

Done.

> Change"Use a tool that exposes the document through the accessibility API
> and verify that decorative images are marked as artifacts." to "Use a tool
> that exposes the document through the accessibility API and verify that the
> decorative image is not exposed through the API."

Done.

> Remove the reference to tabbing to the image from this test procedure step:
> "Read the PDF document with a screen reader, listening to hear that the
> decorative image is not announced when tabbing to the image (if it is
> tabbable) or when reading the content line-by-line."

Changed to: "Read the PDF document with a screen reader, listening to
hear that the
decorative image is not announced when reading the content line-by-line."

> (If the image is the only content of an interactive control, by definition
> it is not decorative; if it is part of the content that also contains text,
> it gets very complicated to explain what the requirement is.)
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 19 April 2011 15:40:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 19 April 2011 15:40:14 GMT