W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: Review comments on PDF12

From: Mary Utt <maryutt@paciellogroup.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 11:00:16 -0400
Message-ID: <BANLkTikRhUH6T5ePpKjXs_=qnn7rryEcfw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Loretta Guarino Reid
<lorettaguarino@google.com> wrote:
> In the test procedure,
> * Change "For each form control," to "For the form control"


> * Modify the 2nd option to read "Use a tool capable of showing the form
> field information to open the PDF document and verify that the form control
> has the correct name, role, value, and state (if appropriate) information."


> Both of the tables have a bit of a mixture of information about PDF and
> information about how Adobe Acrobat exposes that information in its UI. Is
> there a way we can either label things more clearly, or separate the PDF
> information from the Acrobat UI information? For instance, we may need to
> split the information in the Comments column of the first table, or possibly
> just relabel it so that it is clearer that it is describing how to access
> that field in Acrobat.

Maybe discuss on Thursday?

Some thoughts:

An intro to the first table would help. (The following table describes....")

If the Comments column in the first table really only applies to
Acrobat, then it just needs a more specific label. If it's a mix of
info, then it could be split into 2 cols with specific labels.

Received on Tuesday, 19 April 2011 15:00:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:34:07 UTC