W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: General comment for PDF techniques

From: Mary Utt <maryutt@paciellogroup.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 10:41:06 -0400
Message-ID: <BANLkTindOQ66dQh7-XhoG0J2A3c1A6Tsdw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
This seems redundant. The examples that use an authoring or editing
tool now all state:

"This example is shown with Adobe Acrobat Pro [or Adobe LiveCycle
Designer or Microsoft Word or OpenOffice,org Writer]. There are other
software tools that perform similar functions. See the list of other
software tools in PDF Technology Notes, Applications that Produce
Accessible PDF." (The tech notes are linked.)

Also, the last sentence might imply (or readers might infer) that the
tech notes provide more detailed info on specific functionality than
they do.

Is the additional caveat really needed?



On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Loretta Guarino Reid
<lorettaguarino@google.com> wrote:
> I think all of our PDF techniques demonstrate at least one authoring or
> editing tool. Can we add something like the following to the end of each
> description, before the examples?
> Examples x and Y demonstrate how to XXXX using some specific
> authoring tools. Other PDF tools may provide similar
> functions. Check whether this type of functionality is provided by PDF tools
> in {link to Applications
> that Produce Accessible PDF in the PDF Techniques Overview}.
Received on Tuesday, 19 April 2011 14:41:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:34:07 UTC