- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:41:38 -0600
- To: 'Cynthia Shelly' <cyns@exchange.microsoft.com>, 'WCAG' <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I would say that it technically fails -- it ALSO fails for others so it theoretically should fail. But WCAG doesn't specifically say that if it is broken for all ----- But a broken page is not one to get all up in arms for. Presumably it will be fixed and should be evaluated then. Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org > [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Cynthia Shelly > Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 3:39 PM > To: WCAG > Subject: 1.4.4 Text Resize question > > > I'm evaluating a site against WCAG 2.0, and I've run into an > edge case for 1.4.4. > > The page contains a table that is clipped so that there is a > loss of content. Seems like it would fail 1.4.4, except... > It's clipped with the default text size too. There's a loss > of content for all users. Clearly this is a bug, but is it a > failure of 1.4.4? I'm inclined to say No, because there the > content is missing for everyone. Thoughts? Something we > need to clarify in the understanding? > > >
Received on Saturday, 16 February 2008 01:42:15 UTC