- From: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.its.unimelb.edu.au>
- Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 11:15:47 +1100
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 10:32:13AM -0600, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote: > How about > > 2 Non-conforming Content: It is recommended that even non-conforming > content conform to the extent that it can. This is more general, and therefore better than the earlier draft language. > Also we are proposing to add to the claims section something like: > > Progress toward conformance > > Authors who have created content that does not yet conform fully to a > particular WCAG 2.0 conformance level are encouraged to publish a statement > on progress toward conformance. This statement would be the same as a > conformance claim except that it would specify which success criteria have > been met. It may also be useful to include a list of success criteria not > yet met in a progress statement. I like the idea, but I would be more comfortable if any progress statement were required to assert clearly that the content does not conform at the specified level. This way, a progress statement could not be confused with a conformance statement.
Received on Thursday, 7 December 2006 00:15:54 UTC