W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2006

Re: New requirements document and change log

From: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 09:52:06 -0400
Message-Id: <>
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org

Thanks for the clarifications.  ONE ADDITIONAL QUESTION:  If goals 1 
through 6 in the "Introduction" are examples of criteria mentioned 
following, can we use (somewhat subjective?) words like "clear", "clearly", 
"ease of use in mind", and "more diverse" in these goals (criteria?) to 
(objectively? reasonably?) determine (measure?) whether the WCAG2.0 
specification itself fulfills the criteria, or where the WCAG2.0 
specification itself is at in fulfilling the criteria?   If the answer is 
"yes", that's fine..

Thanks again for the responses..

Best wishes
Tim Boland NIST

5 PM 4/20/2006 +0200, you wrote:

>These are criteria which the WCAG 2.0 specification itself is required to 
>fulfill (as opposed to implementations of WCAG); see 
Received on Thursday, 20 April 2006 13:52:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:34:00 UTC