W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2005

RE: Validity as a technique

From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:59:33 +0100
To: "'Yvette Hoitink'" <y.p.hoitink@heritas.nl>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <004801c5e3cd$65af1120$0200a8c0@rsnbiwa>



-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Yvette Hoitink
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 7:48 PM
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: RE: Validity as a technique

What do you think about talking about validity in the techniques instead?

Roberto Scano:
The problem is that people don't read the techniques: I have this experience
with WCAG 1.0 training :-)
Received on Monday, 7 November 2005 18:59:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:40 GMT