- From: Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
- Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 18:06:49 +0100
- To: <Norman.B.Robinson@usps.gov>, <gez.lemon@gmail.com>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
----- Messaggio originale -----
Da: "Robinson, Norman B - Washington, DC"<Norman.B.Robinson@usps.gov>
Inviato: 04/11/05 17.51.11
A: "Gez Lemon"<gez.lemon@gmail.com>, "WCAG WG mailing list"<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Oggetto: RE: Validity
I'll add #5 as "The WAI doesn't have the responsibility for
requiring validity; that is another W3C group's role." I think a few of
the issues are related to terminology and semantics without
understanding the ultimate goals. The WAI, separate from any other
internal or external group, must make the statement that validity is a
requirement.
Roberto:
WAI isn't an independent galaxy inside w3c.
We hqve seen in all this discussion that the main problem is Jaws: is sooo difficoult to implement/optimize it? I think it is also Macromedia interest to solve this big-bug: guidelines cannot solve/hide bugs, but vendor can fix them.
Received on Friday, 4 November 2005 17:03:54 UTC