W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2005

RE: Validity

From: Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 18:06:49 +0100
To: <Norman.B.Robinson@usps.gov>, <gez.lemon@gmail.com>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-Id: <200511041200781.SM00784@Inbox>

----- Messaggio originale -----
    Da: "Robinson, Norman B - Washington, DC"<Norman.B.Robinson@usps.gov>
    Inviato: 04/11/05 17.51.11
    A: "Gez Lemon"<gez.lemon@gmail.com>, "WCAG WG mailing list"<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
    Oggetto: RE: Validity
    	I'll add #5 as "The WAI doesn't have the responsibility for
    requiring validity; that is another W3C group's role." I think a few of
    the issues are related to terminology and semantics without
    understanding the ultimate goals. The WAI, separate from any other
    internal or external group, must make the statement that validity is a

WAI isn't an independent galaxy inside w3c.
We hqve seen in all this discussion that the main problem is Jaws: is sooo difficoult to implement/optimize it? I think it is also Macromedia interest to solve this big-bug: guidelines cannot solve/hide bugs, but vendor can fix them.
Received on Friday, 4 November 2005 17:03:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:57 UTC