GL3.1 L3 SC2 concern? from Tim Boland on 2005-11-04 (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org from October to December 2005)

From: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 09:19:20 -0500
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Message-Id: <5.1.1.5.2.20051104090751.02093db8@mailserver.nist.gov>

I also have a concern about testability of "unusual" as stated in GL3.1L3 
SC2.  I agree with the
concern I thought I heard expressed at the November 3 teleconference on 
this topic.
Is it possible to more specifically (objectively) define what we mean by 
"unusual" in the
context of GL3.1L3SC2, or perhaps employ another term which may be more 
testable,
or (most radical) remove the term entirely from the SC, so that the phrase 
would be
"words used in a restricted way"?

Thanks  and best wishes
Tim Boland NIST

  At 02:00 PM 11/4/2005 +0000, you wrote:

>Yesterday, I heard this argument only in the context of GL 3.1 L3 SC2
>(definitions for words used in an unusual or restricted way), so I
>object to your generalization.

Received on Friday, 4 November 2005 14:19:37 UTC