W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: Abbreviations at Level 2 (was Re: Moving forwards)

From: Gez Lemon <gez.lemon@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 14:00:45 +0000
Message-ID: <e2a28a920511040600t535afb40n@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christophe Strobbe <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org

Hi Christophe,

<Christophe wrote>
A recurring argument against any proposal for a success criterion that
is beneficial to people with cognitive problems is that the success
criterion may be detrimental to websites that are aimed at

Yesterday, I heard this argument only in the context of GL 3.1 L3 SC2
(definitions for words used in an unusual or restricted way), so I
object to your generalization.

It was mentioned in the teleconference once yesterday, in one of the
surveys [1] four times (1.3 L3 SC2 and 1.3 L3 SC3), and references
were made at the face to face meeting; one with regards to error
correction slowing down professionals. I'm not sure of the number of
times that the same point is made in different contexts towards the
same group before it could be considered recurring, but I felt it was
appropriate in this case.

Best regards,


[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/2005-11-03mtg/results

Supplement your vitamins
Received on Friday, 4 November 2005 14:00:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:57 UTC