W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: PROPOSED DEFINITION OF "objective"

From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 07:05:55 -0800
Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20011130070017.03bfa0a0@localhost>
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Cc: judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>, al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>, danield@w3.org
At 01:28 AM 11/30/01 -0500, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>So how do we define

"We" exclude "they". Did 80% "consense" on this? If after 80% agreed did 
anyone propose a "motion to make it unanimous" as happens in most 
centralized/elitist organizations. Did very many people with "developmental 
disabilities" get to vote?

I've become so senile that I don't even know how to unsubscribe from this 
list as well as get my name off that of "active Working Group members."

Count me out.

Unsubscribe.

Remove.

Regrets.
--
Love.
EACH UN-INDEXED/ANNOTATED WEB POSTING WE MAKE IS TESTAMENT TO OUR HYPOCRISY
Received on Friday, 30 November 2001 10:05:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:16 GMT