W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: PROPOSED DEFINITION OF "objective"

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 01:28:29 -0500 (EST)
To: Gregg Vanderheiden <GV@TRACE.WISC.EDU>
cc: "GLWAI Guidelines WG (GL - WAI Guidelines WG)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0111300127370.31557-100000@tux.w3.org>
So how do we define "knowledge of the relevant tech and test methods"? i.e.
how do people qualify to have their opinions considered or not in weighing up
whether 80% agree?

cheers

Charles

On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote:


  At the telecon meeting today we reached consensus on the following
  definition for objective.

  If 80% or more of people who have knowledge of the relevant tech and
  test methods would agree in their judgment



  This is what we would use to test our guidelines or components for
  objectivity.


  It is posted here for comment.



  Gregg

  -- ------------------------------
  Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.
  Professor - Human Factors
  Dept of Ind. Engr. - U of Wis.
  Director - Trace R & D Center
  Gv@trace.wisc.edu <mailto:Gv@trace.wisc.edu>, <http://trace.wisc.edu/>
  FAX 608/262-8848 
  For a list of our listserves send “lists” to listproc@trace.wisc.edu
  <mailto:listproc@trace.wisc.edu>




-- 
Charles McCathieNevile    http://www.w3.org/People/Charles  phone: +61 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative     http://www.w3.org/WAI    fax: +1 617 258 5999
Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia
(or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Friday, 30 November 2001 01:28:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:16 GMT