W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2001

RE: PROPOSED DEFINITION OF "objective"

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <GV@TRACE.WISC.EDU>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 03:40:46 -0600
To: "'Web Content Guidelines'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000001c17983$16dacfc0$066fa8c0@750>
Right,

The purpose of those qualifiers is just to eliminate having people fail
to agree because we picked people who don’t understand what they are
doing.  It is to make it easier to achieve the "objective" label.


This isn't something that goes into the guidelines by the way.   It is
something we use as part of our testing to see if something does go in,
or rather does go in as an objective measure or criteria.   So we
(whomever is doing the testing) will be picking the people.  We/they
just need to pick people who, if they disagree, disagree because the
criteria or whatever is ambiguous, not because they don’t understand
what the question is.


Gregg


-- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Human Factors 
Dept of Ind. Engr. - U of Wis. 
Director - Trace R & D Center 
Gv@trace.wisc.edu <mailto:Gv@trace.wisc.edu>, <http://trace.wisc.edu/> 
FAX 608/262-8848  
For a list of our listserves send “lists” to listproc@trace.wisc.edu
<mailto:listproc@trace.wisc.edu> 


-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Jason White
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 1:16 AM
To: Web Content Guidelines
Subject: Re: PROPOSED DEFINITION OF "objective"

Charles McCathieNevile writes:
 > So how do we define "knowledge of the relevant tech and test
methods"? i.e.
 > how do people qualify to have their opinions considered or not in
weighing up
 > whether 80% agree?
There are two answers to this question which emerged from today's
teleconference:

1. Initially, the question of whether 80% or more of informed
   evaluators would agree, is to be decided hypothetically by the
   working group: do we think that 8 out of 10 testers familiar with
   the relevant language/format specification(s), when given the
content,
   would agree on whether or not the checkpoint had been met.

2. Later, of course, the issue will be decided by assessing the
   results of usability testing, in which actual content evaluations
   will be carried out in application of the guidelines.
Received on Friday, 30 November 2001 04:42:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:16 GMT