- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@mysterylights.com>
- Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 19:14:14 -0000
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, "Al Gilman" <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- Cc: <libby.miller@bristol.ac.uk>, <danbri-semanticweb-vapourware-for-the-masses@rdfweb.org>
> I hereby hand this over to Libby to make some sense out > of. I'm a ruthless so-and-so sometimes :-) Ugh, ruthlessness isn't in my nature :-) The goal is "properties listed by what value types they take". To go this extra step further, you'll have to decide whether or not it's worth losing the structuring information on the value lists. At the moment, I have kept the structure intact:- :counter-increment :values "[ <identifier> <integer>? ]+ | none | inherit" . However, it would be possible to modify the RegExp a bit further [1] to produce:- :counter-increment :values v:identifier, v:integer, v:none, v:inherit . which would then be queryable, but would lose the structure altogether. The next step would be to model the CSS value list syntax in RDF... that would require quite a bit more work, but might be worth it if this were going to be used in a serious application. Cheers, [1] Use something like r'(\w+?)'. -- Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer @prefix : <http://webns.net/roughterms/> . :Sean :hasHomepage <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> .
Received on Saturday, 10 November 2001 14:14:17 UTC