- From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 15:05:07 -0400
- To: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
>AG:: > >Does "provide the ability for users to update pages manually" really say >what needs to be said? Compare "allow the user to require that pages only >update manually." Which of these reflects what in the draft UAAG? WC:: I don't think the distinction between the two is that different. Either way, the user will manually update the page. AG:: >Should we consider adding a link from the "not yet satisfied" sentence to a >dated document providing backups? Actually, a link to the UAAG would be >interesting, too, from the next sentence. WC:: What information would the "dated document providing backups" provide? This vaguely sounds like a techniques document showing authors what to do until user agents have satisfied the requirement. --wendy -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative madison, wi usa tel: +1 608 663 6346 /--
Received on Thursday, 24 August 2000 15:02:21 UTC