W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2000

Re: Clarification of checkpoint 7.4

From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 15:05:07 -0400
Message-Id: <>
To: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org

>Does "provide the ability for users to update pages manually" really say
>what needs to be said?  Compare "allow the user to require that pages only
>update manually."  Which of these reflects what in the draft UAAG?

WC:: I don't think the distinction between the two is that 
different.  Either way, the user will manually update the page.

>Should we consider adding a link from the "not yet satisfied" sentence to a
>dated document providing backups?  Actually, a link to the UAAG would be
>interesting, too, from the next sentence.

What information would the "dated document providing backups" 
provide?  This vaguely sounds like a techniques document showing authors 
what to do until user agents have satisfied the requirement.

wendy a chisholm
world wide web consortium
web accessibility initiative
madison, wi usa
tel: +1 608 663 6346
Received on Thursday, 24 August 2000 15:02:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:33 UTC