W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2000

Re: Final review of WCAG requirements document prior to publication as a W3C note

From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 02 May 2000 07:28:46 -0400
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20000502072420.00b45360@localhost>
To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>, Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>
Cc: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Charles,

it sounds like your requirement then is more general.  something along the 
lines of, "where there are widely implemented, inaccessible techniques, 
show examples of making them accessible."

--wendy

At 11:45 PM 4/28/00 , Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>There is a problem in that this is an insufficient strategy for current
>technology. There are ways of writing things that are currently widely
>implemented and making them more accessible, and we should work on those.
>
>Charles
>
>On Sat, 29 Apr 2000, Jason White wrote:
>
>   My personal preference would be to specify the DOM as the relevant
>   technology and to develop the techniques and strategies in a way that is
>   independent of the particular language (ecmascript, Java, or whatever)
>   that may be used. Of course, examples would be provided in specific
>   programming languages, but the requirement would be stated as a generic
>   one.
>
>
>
>
>--
>Charles McCathieNevile    mailto:charles@w3.org    phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136
>W3C Web Accessibility Initiative                      http://www.w3.org/WAI
>Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053
>Postal: GPO Box 2476V, Melbourne 3001,  Australia

--
wendy a chisholm
world wide web consortium
web accessibility initiative
madison, wi usa
tel: +1 608 663 6346
/--
Received on Tuesday, 2 May 2000 07:27:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:04 GMT