W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2000

Re: Final review of WCAG requirements document prior to publication as a W3C note

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 23:45:28 -0400 (EDT)
To: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>
cc: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0004282344480.25527-100000@tux.w3.org>
There is a problem in that this is an insufficient strategy for current
technology. There are ways of writing things that are currently widely
implemented and making them more accessible, and we should work on those.

Charles

On Sat, 29 Apr 2000, Jason White wrote:

  My personal preference would be to specify the DOM as the relevant
  technology and to develop the techniques and strategies in a way that is
  independent of the particular language (ecmascript, Java, or whatever)
  that may be used. Of course, examples would be provided in specific
  programming languages, but the requirement would be stated as a generic
  one.
  
  
  

--
Charles McCathieNevile    mailto:charles@w3.org    phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative                      http://www.w3.org/WAI
Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053
Postal: GPO Box 2476V, Melbourne 3001,  Australia 
Received on Friday, 28 April 2000 23:45:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:04 GMT