W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 1999

Re: proposal for wording re: grouping links (WCAG techniques document)

From: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 12:48:06 -0400
Message-Id: <199908301649.MAA06850@smtp1.mail.iamworld.net>
To: Wendy A Chisholm <chisholm@trace.wisc.edu>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Cc: w3c-wai-cg@w3.org
I guess all I can find in charters is that the CG is chartered to answer
questions like this...

Al

At 11:01 AM 8/30/99 -0500, Wendy A Chisholm wrote:
>hello,
>
>>Recommended action: ask ER-IG to consider, test, and recommend methods for
>>extracting an effective document structure for existing pages.  Capture the
>>result in to the UA and AU documents.
>>
>Is ER the most appropriate group?  This proposal rings with "user testing"
>in my ears, and I think that the UA group is closest to the users.  However
>there is no "user testing" component in any of the group's charter. 
>
>As mentioned before, I am working on proposed edits to the Navigation and
>Validation sections of the Techniques document.
>
>--wendy
>wendy chisholm
>human factors engineer
>trace research and development center
>university of wisconsin - madison, USA
> 
Received on Monday, 30 August 1999 12:40:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:00 GMT