W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 1999

Re: Conformance proposal re-drafted

From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 15:41:15 +0100
Message-Id: <199903231441.PAA24010@www47.inria.fr>
To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
cc: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org

> For example, an authoring tool might claim to be triple-A conformant if it
> produced content that is triple-A (whereas I expect an authoring tool
> which conforms to ATAG to have to do some other things), or a purchasing
> requirement might require all websites paid for to be double-A conformant

An AU may claim AA if it conforms to all the P1 and P2 of the AU
Guidelines, which is different that saying it generates content that
conforms to P1 + P2 Web Content Guidelines.
Received on Tuesday, 23 March 1999 09:41:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:46:59 GMT