W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 1999

Re: Conformance proposal re-drafted

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 09:46:51 -0500 (EST)
To: dd@w3.org
cc: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.04.9903230945350.13715-100000@tux.w3.org>
This is true. But it can also claim that it produces content which is
WCAG double-A conformant, even if it doesn't meet some P1 guideline of


On Tue, 23 Mar 1999, Daniel Dardailler wrote:

  > For example, an authoring tool might claim to be triple-A conformant if it
  > produced content that is triple-A (whereas I expect an authoring tool
  > which conforms to ATAG to have to do some other things), or a purchasing
  > requirement might require all websites paid for to be double-A conformant
  An AU may claim AA if it conforms to all the P1 and P2 of the AU
  Guidelines, which is different that saying it generates content that
  conforms to P1 + P2 Web Content Guidelines.

--Charles McCathieNevile            mailto:charles@w3.org
phone: +1 617 258 0992   http://www.w3.org/People/Charles
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative    http://www.w3.org/WAI
MIT/LCS  -  545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139,  USA
Received on Tuesday, 23 March 1999 09:46:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:29 UTC