W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 1999

Re: Conformance proposal re-drafted

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 09:26:12 -0500 (EST)
To: dd@w3.org
cc: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.04.9903230923480.13715-100000@tux.w3.org>
Another example:

Ministry of silly walks writes its internal Web Content Style Guide, and
that Style Guide claims that it describes a process which is conformant to
double-A of the etc

On Tue, 23 Mar 1999, Daniel Dardailler wrote:
  > Example: "This standard conforms to conformance level 'Double-A' of 'Web
  > Content Accessibility Guidelines' available at
  > http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WD-WAI-PAGEAUTH-19990316."
  I'm still at lost of what that means exactly.
  If some organization claims that their guidelines conforms to AA for
  instance, does it mean that the best practices they advocate in their
  document "include" at least all of our AA checkpoints, or "is exactly" 
  our set of AA checkpoints ? Can they change the wording we use ?
  What does "satisfying" mean for a process ?

--Charles McCathieNevile            mailto:charles@w3.org
phone: +1 617 258 0992   http://www.w3.org/People/Charles
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative    http://www.w3.org/WAI
MIT/LCS  -  545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139,  USA
Received on Tuesday, 23 March 1999 09:26:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:29 UTC