W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 1998

RE: Okay, is this better?

From: Mike Paciello <paciello@yuri.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 1998 16:09:17 -0500
Message-Id: <3.0.32.19980327160914.00a06960@pop.ma.ultranet.com>
To: Gregg Vanderheiden <GV@TraceCenter.org>, "'Liam Quinn'" <liam@htmlhelp.com>, "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I would second Gregg's suggestion. Functional descriptions are much more
critical to both the navigational and cognitive needs of the user. If,
however the color of the line somehow implied meaning -- like a street
signal -- then including the color would be important.

Regards,

Mike


At 02:19 PM 3/27/98 -0600, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote:
>
>-----Original Message-----
><SNIP>
>>alt text would work well for all three audiences: maybe something like
>><img alt="purple line________________________________"> and
>><img alt="zig-zag line /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\"> would
>>work well.
>
>I would use
>
><IMG ALT="-------------------------" TITLE="Purple line">
>
>ALT as replacement text, TITLE as an image title:  If we treat these
>attributes this way, we get simplicity and consistency.
>
>--
>Liam Quinn
>
>
>I would suggest that it should reflect the function of the line rather
than the appearance as in
>
><IMG  ALT= "Section Divider Line"
>
>Gregg
>
>-- ------------------------------
>Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.
>Professor - Human Factors
>Dept of Ind. Engr. - U of Wis.
>Director - Trace R & D Center
>GV@tracecenter.org , http://tracecenter.org/
>FAX 608/262-8848  
>For a list of our listserves send "lists" to listproc@tracecenter.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 27 March 1998 16:09:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:46:57 GMT