W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org > April 2004

Re: EARL evalusations - general comments

From: Chris Ridpath <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 10:13:33 -0400
Message-ID: <009c01c42098$56ad43d0$b040968e@WILDDOG>
To: "ER" <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>

If this is just a comment on the evaluation then it should be fine.

It doesn't appear to be an assertion about the compliance rating so it won't
conflict with any rating.

Is there another purpose to the statement (other than a comment)?

Chris


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Charles McCathieNevile" <charles@sidar.org>
To: "ER" <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2004 11:59 PM
Subject: EARL evalusations - general comments


>
> Hi folks,
>
> a lot of EARL evaluations record a number of Assertions at once, made
> as part of an evaluation. It is often useful to be able to make a
> general comment about the evaluation. In Hera we have enabled this by
> adding some notes about the document that includes the evaluation
> results.
>
> <rdf:Description about="">
> <rdfs:label>Chaals' evaluation of something</rdfs:label>
> <rdfs:comment>This is a pretty rough evaluation. It is really just to
> enable me to test some features of annotating an evaluation in
> EARL</rdfs:comment>
> </rdf:Description>
>
> What do people think about this approach? In particular, what are the
> implications for manipulating the content - what do we do when we are
> merging several evaluations, to be able to gather the comments
> together.
>
> cheers
>
> Chaals
>
> --
> Charles McCathieNevile                          Fundación Sidar
> charles@sidar.org                                http://www.sidar.org
Received on Monday, 12 April 2004 10:14:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:10:42 GMT