RE: URI for Re: EARL for non-experts

On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote:

>* short introduction on what EARL is for (not only how but also who
>should use it and why)

Actually I have a whole presentation on that - I just need to put it online
so I can link it...

>* add a hint that mixing in other name spaces has an impact on the tools
>processing the code

Good idea.

>* the subject does not have to be a document, it can also be a tool
>(interesting for UA and AU)

Yep. This is interesting but I think belongs in the "advanced" stuff for the
moment. There are actually a couple of use cases which converge - tracking
information about the evaluation tools available would be easier if we had a
corresponding way of describing tools and services (similar to WSDL, but not
limited to Web Services per se, and a bit more semantically rich than "text
description of the tool"), ....

>* avoid using non EARL in basic examples, keep them for the advanced
>section (slide 7, testcase)

Yep. I had the same thought, and started to movein that direction already.

Thanks for the comments - keep 'em coming :-)

cheers

Chaals