W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org > October 2001

Re: Validation as EARL

From: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 18:50:22 +0100 (BST)
To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
cc: <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20011022184159.O415-100000@fenris.webthing.com>
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:

> Cool...
> Do you have a way for the validator to point to errors as URIs in a spec
> instead of just strings?

That's somewhere on the long-term TBD list, and any public discussion
of it will probably be on the www-validator list[1].

> (BTW, is this URI going to be stable - i.e. can I build another experiment on
> top of the first one?)

Not necessarily stable.  If you want to build another experiment on
top of it, let me know what you need to be stable and we'll take it
from there.

[1] If the damn thing lets me resubscribe.  It's just unsubscribed me
after my spam filter bounced the message

Nick Kew

Site Valet - the essential service for anyone with a website.
Received on Monday, 22 October 2001 13:50:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:01:33 UTC