W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org > February 2001

Re: EARL

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 04:59:40 -0500 (EST)
To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
cc: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>, Daniel Dardailler <dd@w3.org>, <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0102010456480.14926-100000@tux.w3.org>

hi all

[* danbri is trying wretchedly to catch up on this thread]

If someone could send me a summary of where things are up to with EARL
inc URLs, (and what exactly it is...) we might be able to revisit the Prolog demo,
which has improved in capabilities lately. Also ILRT now have an RDF query
engine in development which runs server-side (no fancy inference stuff
though), so that might be useful. See Libby's demo at
http://swordfish.rdfweb.org/rdfquery/

thanks for any pointers

your former lurker,

dan


On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:

> There are a couple of candidates. I described one a year ago that has a set
> of properties, a schema (thanks DanConnolly), a bit of a toy in javascript
> that can use the properties (with its own prolog-like syntax for amking
> queries) that Dan Brickley made based on Jan Grant's tiny prolog interpreter.
> This works for basic confromance statements, but needs something else to add
> things like "who said", and "when" and "how do they know". I imagined that
> Dublin Core would be good for the first two, and AERT would provide a set of
> tests which have URIs that we could use for the latter.
>
> There is a desire to produce a more complete EARL - based or not on this
> earlier one is unclear. The meeting on Thursday morning at the W3C plenary
> will apparently be dedicated to just this task.
>
> That's as far as I have understood the story.
>
> Cheers
>
> Charles McCN
>
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Sean B. Palmer wrote:
>
>   > One of the things I wanted to do with the WART is to get
>   > it to output EARL.
>
>   What's the status with EARL currently? It keeps getting mentioned on the
>   lists in two completely different contexts: 1) as a completely finished
>   language that can already be output, and 2) as a develpment by ERT that
>   needs a spin-off group devoted to it (the "friday group"). [Note: While I
>   would like to join the "friday group" , I certainly can't get to the
>   meeting, and I still have no way of even getting onto a call...]
>
>   As far as I can tell by reading through the archives again and looking at
>   the ERT homepage, we have a great deal of discussion about uses etc., but
>   not too much about syntax. The most worrying thing is that we have an
>   architecture, but no RDF Schema yet... Daniel made a list of some of the
>   properties needed; could some one look at the ontologies of these, and we
>   should be able to make a Schema fairly quickly. Then anything that outputs
>   EARL will have something to conform to: a syntax.
>
>   --
>   Kindest Regards,
>   Sean B. Palmer
>   @prefix : <http://webns.net/roughterms/> .
>   [ :name "Sean B. Palmer" ] :hasHomepage <http://infomesh.net/sbp/> .
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 1 February 2001 04:59:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:10:38 GMT